Part 4 / ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS

PART 4: ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS

4.1.   Hazardous to the aquatic environment

Hazardous to the aquatic environment

4.1.1.   Definitions and general considerations

Definitions and general considerations

4.1.1.1.   Definitions Definitions

(a) 

‘acute aquatic toxicity’ means the intrinsic property of a substance to be injurious to an aquatic organism in a short-term aquatic exposure to that substance.

(a) 
(a) 

‘acute aquatic toxicity’ means the intrinsic property of a substance to be injurious to an aquatic organism in a short-term aquatic exposure to that substance.

‘acute aquatic toxicity’ means the intrinsic property of a substance to be injurious to an aquatic organism in a short-term aquatic exposure to that substance.

(b) 

►M12  short-term (acute) hazard ◄ ’ means for classification purposes the hazard of a substance or mixture caused by its acute toxicity to an organism during short-term aquatic exposure to that substance or mixture.

(b) 
(b) 

►M12  short-term (acute) hazard ◄ ’ means for classification purposes the hazard of a substance or mixture caused by its acute toxicity to an organism during short-term aquatic exposure to that substance or mixture.

►M12  short-term (acute) hazard ◄ ’ means for classification purposes the hazard of a substance or mixture caused by its acute toxicity to an organism during short-term aquatic exposure to that substance or mixture. ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

(c) 

‘availability of a substance’ means the extent to which this substance becomes a soluble or disaggregate species. For metal availability, the extent to which the metal ion portion of a metal (M°) compound can disaggregate from the rest of the compound (molecule).

(c) 
(c) 

‘availability of a substance’ means the extent to which this substance becomes a soluble or disaggregate species. For metal availability, the extent to which the metal ion portion of a metal (M°) compound can disaggregate from the rest of the compound (molecule).

‘availability of a substance’ means the extent to which this substance becomes a soluble or disaggregate species. For metal availability, the extent to which the metal ion portion of a metal (M°) compound can disaggregate from the rest of the compound (molecule).

(d) 

‘bioavailability’ or ‘biological availability’ means the extent to which a substance is taken up by an organism, and distributed to an area within the organism. It is dependent upon physico-chemical properties of the substance, anatomy and physiology of the organism, pharmacokinetics, and route of exposure. Availability is not a prerequisite for bioavailability.

(d) 
(d) 

‘bioavailability’ or ‘biological availability’ means the extent to which a substance is taken up by an organism, and distributed to an area within the organism. It is dependent upon physico-chemical properties of the substance, anatomy and physiology of the organism, pharmacokinetics, and route of exposure. Availability is not a prerequisite for bioavailability.

‘bioavailability’ or ‘biological availability’ means the extent to which a substance is taken up by an organism, and distributed to an area within the organism. It is dependent upon physico-chemical properties of the substance, anatomy and physiology of the organism, pharmacokinetics, and route of exposure. Availability is not a prerequisite for bioavailability.

(e) 

‘bioaccumulation’ means the net result of uptake, transformation and elimination of a substance in an organism due to all routes of exposure (i.e. air, water, sediment/soil and food).

(e) 
(e) 

‘bioaccumulation’ means the net result of uptake, transformation and elimination of a substance in an organism due to all routes of exposure (i.e. air, water, sediment/soil and food).

‘bioaccumulation’ means the net result of uptake, transformation and elimination of a substance in an organism due to all routes of exposure (i.e. air, water, sediment/soil and food).

(f) 

‘bioconcentration’ means the net result of uptake, transformation and elimination of a substance in an organism due to waterborne exposure.

(f) 
(f) 

‘bioconcentration’ means the net result of uptake, transformation and elimination of a substance in an organism due to waterborne exposure.

‘bioconcentration’ means the net result of uptake, transformation and elimination of a substance in an organism due to waterborne exposure.

(g) 

‘chronic aquatic toxicity’ means the intrinsic property of a substance to cause adverse effects to aquatic organisms during aquatic exposures which are determined in relation to the life-cycle of the organism.

(g) 
(g) 

‘chronic aquatic toxicity’ means the intrinsic property of a substance to cause adverse effects to aquatic organisms during aquatic exposures which are determined in relation to the life-cycle of the organism.

‘chronic aquatic toxicity’ means the intrinsic property of a substance to cause adverse effects to aquatic organisms during aquatic exposures which are determined in relation to the life-cycle of the organism.

(h) 

‘degradation’ means the decomposition of organic molecules to smaller molecules and eventually to carbon dioxide, water and salts.

(h) 
(h) 

‘degradation’ means the decomposition of organic molecules to smaller molecules and eventually to carbon dioxide, water and salts.

‘degradation’ means the decomposition of organic molecules to smaller molecules and eventually to carbon dioxide, water and salts.

(i) 

‘ECx’ means the effect concentration associated with x% response.

(i) 
(i) 

‘ECx’ means the effect concentration associated with x% response.

‘ECx’ means the effect concentration associated with x% response. x

(j) 

►M12  long-term (chronic) hazard ◄ ’ means for classification purposes the hazard of a substance or mixture caused by its chronic toxicity following long-term exposure in the aquatic environment.

(j) 
(j) 

►M12  long-term (chronic) hazard ◄ ’ means for classification purposes the hazard of a substance or mixture caused by its chronic toxicity following long-term exposure in the aquatic environment.

►M12  long-term (chronic) hazard ◄ ’ means for classification purposes the hazard of a substance or mixture caused by its chronic toxicity following long-term exposure in the aquatic environment. ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

(k) 

‘no observed effect concentration (NOEC)’ means the test concentration immediately below the lowest tested concentration with statistically significant adverse effect. The NOEC has no statistically significant adverse effect compared to the control.

(k) 
(k) 

‘no observed effect concentration (NOEC)’ means the test concentration immediately below the lowest tested concentration with statistically significant adverse effect. The NOEC has no statistically significant adverse effect compared to the control.

‘no observed effect concentration (NOEC)’ means the test concentration immediately below the lowest tested concentration with statistically significant adverse effect. The NOEC has no statistically significant adverse effect compared to the control.

4.1.1.2.   Basic elements Basic elements

4.1.1.2.0.

►M12  Hazardous to the aquatic environment is differentiated into:

— 
short-term (acute) aquatic hazard
— 
long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard. ◄

4.1.1.2.0.

►M12  Hazardous to the aquatic environment is differentiated into:

— 
short-term (acute) aquatic hazard
— 
long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard. ◄

4.1.1.2.0.

►M12  Hazardous to the aquatic environment is differentiated into:

— 
short-term (acute) aquatic hazard
— 
long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard. ◄

4.1.1.2.0.

4.1.1.2.0.

►M12  Hazardous to the aquatic environment is differentiated into:

— 
short-term (acute) aquatic hazard
— 
long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard. ◄

►M12  Hazardous to the aquatic environment is differentiated into: ►M12 ►M12 ►M12

— 
short-term (acute) aquatic hazard
— 
— 
short-term (acute) aquatic hazard
short-term (acute) aquatic hazard
— 
long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard. ◄
— 
— 
long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard. ◄
long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard. ◄
 ◄

4.1.1.2.1.

The basic elements used for classification for aquatic environmental hazards are:

— 
acute aquatic toxicity,
— 
chronic aquatic toxicity,
— 
potential for or actual bioaccumulation, and
— 
degradation (biotic or abiotic) for organic chemicals.

4.1.1.2.1.

The basic elements used for classification for aquatic environmental hazards are:

— 
acute aquatic toxicity,
— 
chronic aquatic toxicity,
— 
potential for or actual bioaccumulation, and
— 
degradation (biotic or abiotic) for organic chemicals.

4.1.1.2.1.

The basic elements used for classification for aquatic environmental hazards are:

— 
acute aquatic toxicity,
— 
chronic aquatic toxicity,
— 
potential for or actual bioaccumulation, and
— 
degradation (biotic or abiotic) for organic chemicals.

4.1.1.2.1.

4.1.1.2.1.

The basic elements used for classification for aquatic environmental hazards are:

— 
acute aquatic toxicity,
— 
chronic aquatic toxicity,
— 
potential for or actual bioaccumulation, and
— 
degradation (biotic or abiotic) for organic chemicals.

The basic elements used for classification for aquatic environmental hazards are:

— 
acute aquatic toxicity,
— 
— 
acute aquatic toxicity,
acute aquatic toxicity,
— 
chronic aquatic toxicity,
— 
— 
chronic aquatic toxicity,
chronic aquatic toxicity,
— 
potential for or actual bioaccumulation, and
— 
— 
potential for or actual bioaccumulation, and
potential for or actual bioaccumulation, and
— 
degradation (biotic or abiotic) for organic chemicals.
— 
— 
degradation (biotic or abiotic) for organic chemicals.
degradation (biotic or abiotic) for organic chemicals.

4.1.1.2.2.

Preferably data shall be derived using the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3). In practice data from other standardised test methods such as national methods shall also be used where they are considered as equivalent. Where valid data are available from non-standard testing and from non-testing methods, these shall be considered in classification provided they fulfil the requirements specified in section 1 of Annex XI to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. In general, both freshwater and marine species toxicity data are considered suitable for use in classification provided the test methods used are equivalent. Where such data are not available classification shall be based on the best available data. See also Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

4.1.1.2.2.

Preferably data shall be derived using the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3). In practice data from other standardised test methods such as national methods shall also be used where they are considered as equivalent. Where valid data are available from non-standard testing and from non-testing methods, these shall be considered in classification provided they fulfil the requirements specified in section 1 of Annex XI to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. In general, both freshwater and marine species toxicity data are considered suitable for use in classification provided the test methods used are equivalent. Where such data are not available classification shall be based on the best available data. See also Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

4.1.1.2.2.

Preferably data shall be derived using the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3). In practice data from other standardised test methods such as national methods shall also be used where they are considered as equivalent. Where valid data are available from non-standard testing and from non-testing methods, these shall be considered in classification provided they fulfil the requirements specified in section 1 of Annex XI to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. In general, both freshwater and marine species toxicity data are considered suitable for use in classification provided the test methods used are equivalent. Where such data are not available classification shall be based on the best available data. See also Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

4.1.1.2.2.

4.1.1.2.2.

Preferably data shall be derived using the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3). In practice data from other standardised test methods such as national methods shall also be used where they are considered as equivalent. Where valid data are available from non-standard testing and from non-testing methods, these shall be considered in classification provided they fulfil the requirements specified in section 1 of Annex XI to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. In general, both freshwater and marine species toxicity data are considered suitable for use in classification provided the test methods used are equivalent. Where such data are not available classification shall be based on the best available data. See also Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

Preferably data shall be derived using the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3). In practice data from other standardised test methods such as national methods shall also be used where they are considered as equivalent. Where valid data are available from non-standard testing and from non-testing methods, these shall be considered in classification provided they fulfil the requirements specified in section 1 of Annex XI to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. In general, both freshwater and marine species toxicity data are considered suitable for use in classification provided the test methods used are equivalent. Where such data are not available classification shall be based on the best available data. See also Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

4.1.1.3.   Other considerations Other considerations

4.1.1.3.1.

Classification of substances and mixtures for environmental hazards requires the identification of the hazards they present to the aquatic environment. ►M12  The aquatic environment is considered in terms of the aquatic organisms that live in the water, and the aquatic ecosystem of which they are part. The basis, therefore, of the identification of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) hazards is the aquatic toxicity of the substance or mixture, although this shall be modified by taking account of further information on the degradation and bioaccumulation behaviour, if appropriate. ◄

4.1.1.3.1.

Classification of substances and mixtures for environmental hazards requires the identification of the hazards they present to the aquatic environment. ►M12  The aquatic environment is considered in terms of the aquatic organisms that live in the water, and the aquatic ecosystem of which they are part. The basis, therefore, of the identification of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) hazards is the aquatic toxicity of the substance or mixture, although this shall be modified by taking account of further information on the degradation and bioaccumulation behaviour, if appropriate. ◄

4.1.1.3.1.

Classification of substances and mixtures for environmental hazards requires the identification of the hazards they present to the aquatic environment. ►M12  The aquatic environment is considered in terms of the aquatic organisms that live in the water, and the aquatic ecosystem of which they are part. The basis, therefore, of the identification of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) hazards is the aquatic toxicity of the substance or mixture, although this shall be modified by taking account of further information on the degradation and bioaccumulation behaviour, if appropriate. ◄

4.1.1.3.1.

4.1.1.3.1.

Classification of substances and mixtures for environmental hazards requires the identification of the hazards they present to the aquatic environment. ►M12  The aquatic environment is considered in terms of the aquatic organisms that live in the water, and the aquatic ecosystem of which they are part. The basis, therefore, of the identification of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) hazards is the aquatic toxicity of the substance or mixture, although this shall be modified by taking account of further information on the degradation and bioaccumulation behaviour, if appropriate. ◄

Classification of substances and mixtures for environmental hazards requires the identification of the hazards they present to the aquatic environment. ►M12  The aquatic environment is considered in terms of the aquatic organisms that live in the water, and the aquatic ecosystem of which they are part. The basis, therefore, of the identification of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) hazards is the aquatic toxicity of the substance or mixture, although this shall be modified by taking account of further information on the degradation and bioaccumulation behaviour, if appropriate. ◄ ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

4.1.1.3.2.

While the classification system applies to all substances and mixtures, it is recognised that for special cases (e.g. metals) the European Chemicals Agency has issued guidance.

4.1.1.3.2.

While the classification system applies to all substances and mixtures, it is recognised that for special cases (e.g. metals) the European Chemicals Agency has issued guidance.

4.1.1.3.2.

While the classification system applies to all substances and mixtures, it is recognised that for special cases (e.g. metals) the European Chemicals Agency has issued guidance.

4.1.1.3.2.

4.1.1.3.2.

While the classification system applies to all substances and mixtures, it is recognised that for special cases (e.g. metals) the European Chemicals Agency has issued guidance.

While the classification system applies to all substances and mixtures, it is recognised that for special cases (e.g. metals) the European Chemicals Agency has issued guidance.

4.1.2.   Classification criteria for substances

Classification criteria for substances

4.1.2.1.

►M12  The system for classification recognises that the intrinsic hazard to aquatic organisms is represented by both the acute and chronic toxicity of a substance. For the long-term (chronic) hazard, separate hazard categories are defined representing a gradation in the level of hazard identified. ◄ The lowest of the available toxicity values between and within the different trophic levels (fish, crustacean, algae/aquatic plants) shall normally be used to define the appropriate hazard category(ies). There are circumstances, however, when a weight of evidence approach is appropriate.

4.1.2.1.

►M12  The system for classification recognises that the intrinsic hazard to aquatic organisms is represented by both the acute and chronic toxicity of a substance. For the long-term (chronic) hazard, separate hazard categories are defined representing a gradation in the level of hazard identified. ◄ The lowest of the available toxicity values between and within the different trophic levels (fish, crustacean, algae/aquatic plants) shall normally be used to define the appropriate hazard category(ies). There are circumstances, however, when a weight of evidence approach is appropriate.

4.1.2.1.

►M12  The system for classification recognises that the intrinsic hazard to aquatic organisms is represented by both the acute and chronic toxicity of a substance. For the long-term (chronic) hazard, separate hazard categories are defined representing a gradation in the level of hazard identified. ◄ The lowest of the available toxicity values between and within the different trophic levels (fish, crustacean, algae/aquatic plants) shall normally be used to define the appropriate hazard category(ies). There are circumstances, however, when a weight of evidence approach is appropriate.

4.1.2.1.

4.1.2.1.

►M12  The system for classification recognises that the intrinsic hazard to aquatic organisms is represented by both the acute and chronic toxicity of a substance. For the long-term (chronic) hazard, separate hazard categories are defined representing a gradation in the level of hazard identified. ◄ The lowest of the available toxicity values between and within the different trophic levels (fish, crustacean, algae/aquatic plants) shall normally be used to define the appropriate hazard category(ies). There are circumstances, however, when a weight of evidence approach is appropriate.

►M12  The system for classification recognises that the intrinsic hazard to aquatic organisms is represented by both the acute and chronic toxicity of a substance. For the long-term (chronic) hazard, separate hazard categories are defined representing a gradation in the level of hazard identified. ◄ The lowest of the available toxicity values between and within the different trophic levels (fish, crustacean, algae/aquatic plants) shall normally be used to define the appropriate hazard category(ies). There are circumstances, however, when a weight of evidence approach is appropriate. ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

4.1.2.2.

►M12  The core classification system for substances consists of one short-term (acute) hazard classification category and three long-term (chronic) hazard classification categories. The short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) classification categories are applied independently. ◄

4.1.2.2.

►M12  The core classification system for substances consists of one short-term (acute) hazard classification category and three long-term (chronic) hazard classification categories. The short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) classification categories are applied independently. ◄

4.1.2.2.

►M12  The core classification system for substances consists of one short-term (acute) hazard classification category and three long-term (chronic) hazard classification categories. The short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) classification categories are applied independently. ◄

4.1.2.2.

4.1.2.2.

►M12  The core classification system for substances consists of one short-term (acute) hazard classification category and three long-term (chronic) hazard classification categories. The short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) classification categories are applied independently. ◄

►M12  The core classification system for substances consists of one short-term (acute) hazard classification category and three long-term (chronic) hazard classification categories. The short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) classification categories are applied independently. ◄ ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

4.1.2.3.

►M12  The criteria for classification of a substance in Acute 1 are defined on the basis of acute aquatic toxicity data only (EC50 or LC 50). The criteria for classification of a substance into Chronic 1 to 3 follow a tiered approach where the first step is to see if available information on chronic toxicity merits long-term (chronic) hazard classification. In absence of adequate chronic toxicity data, the subsequent step is to combine two types of information, i.e. acute aquatic toxicity data and environmental fate data (degradability and bioaccumulation data) (see Figure 4.1.1). ◄

Figure 4.1.1

▼M12

Categories for substances long-term (chronic) hazardous to the aquatic environment

▼M2 image

Text of image

4.1.2.3.

►M12  The criteria for classification of a substance in Acute 1 are defined on the basis of acute aquatic toxicity data only (EC50 or LC 50). The criteria for classification of a substance into Chronic 1 to 3 follow a tiered approach where the first step is to see if available information on chronic toxicity merits long-term (chronic) hazard classification. In absence of adequate chronic toxicity data, the subsequent step is to combine two types of information, i.e. acute aquatic toxicity data and environmental fate data (degradability and bioaccumulation data) (see Figure 4.1.1). ◄

Figure 4.1.1

▼M12

Categories for substances long-term (chronic) hazardous to the aquatic environment

▼M2 image

Text of image

4.1.2.3.

►M12  The criteria for classification of a substance in Acute 1 are defined on the basis of acute aquatic toxicity data only (EC50 or LC 50). The criteria for classification of a substance into Chronic 1 to 3 follow a tiered approach where the first step is to see if available information on chronic toxicity merits long-term (chronic) hazard classification. In absence of adequate chronic toxicity data, the subsequent step is to combine two types of information, i.e. acute aquatic toxicity data and environmental fate data (degradability and bioaccumulation data) (see Figure 4.1.1). ◄

Figure 4.1.1

▼M12

Categories for substances long-term (chronic) hazardous to the aquatic environment

▼M2 image

Text of image

4.1.2.3.

4.1.2.3.

►M12  The criteria for classification of a substance in Acute 1 are defined on the basis of acute aquatic toxicity data only (EC50 or LC 50). The criteria for classification of a substance into Chronic 1 to 3 follow a tiered approach where the first step is to see if available information on chronic toxicity merits long-term (chronic) hazard classification. In absence of adequate chronic toxicity data, the subsequent step is to combine two types of information, i.e. acute aquatic toxicity data and environmental fate data (degradability and bioaccumulation data) (see Figure 4.1.1). ◄

Figure 4.1.1

▼M12

Categories for substances long-term (chronic) hazardous to the aquatic environment

▼M2 image

Text of image

►M12  The criteria for classification of a substance in Acute 1 are defined on the basis of acute aquatic toxicity data only (EC50 or LC 50). The criteria for classification of a substance into Chronic 1 to 3 follow a tiered approach where the first step is to see if available information on chronic toxicity merits long-term (chronic) hazard classification. In absence of adequate chronic toxicity data, the subsequent step is to combine two types of information, i.e. acute aquatic toxicity data and environmental fate data (degradability and bioaccumulation data) (see Figure 4.1.1). ◄ ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

Figure 4.1.1

▼M12 ▼M12

Categories for substances long-term (chronic) hazardous to the aquatic environment Categories for substances long-term (chronic) hazardous to the aquatic environment

▼M2 ▼M2 image

Text of image Text of image

Are there adequate chronic toxicity data available for all three trophic levels?

Yes

Classify according to the criteria given in Table 4.1.0(b) (i) or 4.1.0(b)(ii) depending on information on rapid degradation

No

Are there adequate chronic toxicity data available for one or two trophic levels?

Yes

Assess both:

(a) according to the criteria given in Table 4.1.0(b)(i) or 4.1.0(b)(ii) (depending on information on rapid degradation), and

(b) (if for the other trophic level(s) adequate acute toxicity data are available) according to the criteria given in Table 4.1.0(b) (iii),

and classify according to the most stringent outcome

No

Are there adequate acute toxicity data available?

Yes

Classify according to the criteria given in Table 4.1.0(b) (iii)

4.1.2.4.

►M12  The system also introduces a ‘safety net’ classification (referred to as Chronic 4) for use when the data available do not allow classification under the formal criteria for Acute 1 or Chronic 1 to 3 but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern (see example Table 4.1.0). ◄

4.1.2.4.

►M12  The system also introduces a ‘safety net’ classification (referred to as Chronic 4) for use when the data available do not allow classification under the formal criteria for Acute 1 or Chronic 1 to 3 but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern (see example Table 4.1.0). ◄

4.1.2.4.

►M12  The system also introduces a ‘safety net’ classification (referred to as Chronic 4) for use when the data available do not allow classification under the formal criteria for Acute 1 or Chronic 1 to 3 but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern (see example Table 4.1.0). ◄

4.1.2.4.

4.1.2.4.

►M12  The system also introduces a ‘safety net’ classification (referred to as Chronic 4) for use when the data available do not allow classification under the formal criteria for Acute 1 or Chronic 1 to 3 but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern (see example Table 4.1.0). ◄

►M12  The system also introduces a ‘safety net’ classification (referred to as Chronic 4) for use when the data available do not allow classification under the formal criteria for Acute 1 or Chronic 1 to 3 but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern (see example Table 4.1.0). ◄ ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

4.1.2.5.

Substances with acute toxicities below 1 mg/l or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute as components of a mixture to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach (see note 1 of Table 4.1.0 and section 4.1.3.5.5).

4.1.2.5.

Substances with acute toxicities below 1 mg/l or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute as components of a mixture to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach (see note 1 of Table 4.1.0 and section 4.1.3.5.5).

4.1.2.5.

Substances with acute toxicities below 1 mg/l or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute as components of a mixture to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach (see note 1 of Table 4.1.0 and section 4.1.3.5.5).

4.1.2.5.

4.1.2.5.

Substances with acute toxicities below 1 mg/l or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute as components of a mixture to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach (see note 1 of Table 4.1.0 and section 4.1.3.5.5).

Substances with acute toxicities below 1 mg/l or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute as components of a mixture to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach (see note 1 of Table 4.1.0 and section 4.1.3.5.5).

4.1.2.6.

The criteria for classifying and categorising substances as ‘hazardous to the aquatic environment’ are summarised in Table 4.1.0.

▼M12

Table 4.1.0

Classification categories for substances hazardous to the aquatic environment

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

▼M2

Note 1:

When classifying substances as Acute Category 1 and/or Chronic Category 1 it is necessary at the same time to indicate the appropriate M-factor(s) (see Table 4.1.3).

Note 2:

Classification shall be based on the ErC50 [= EC50 (growth rate)]. In circumstances where the basis of the EC50 is not specified or no ErC50 is recorded, classification shall be based on the lowest EC50 available.

Note 3:

When no useful data on degradability are available, either experimentally determined or estimated data, the substance should be regarded as not rapidly degradable.

Note 4:

‘No acute toxicity’ is taken to mean that the L(E)C50(s) is/are above the water solubility. Also for poorly soluble substances, (water solubility < 1 mg/l), where there is evidence that the acute test does not provide a true measure of the intrinsic toxicity.

4.1.2.6.

The criteria for classifying and categorising substances as ‘hazardous to the aquatic environment’ are summarised in Table 4.1.0.

▼M12

Table 4.1.0

Classification categories for substances hazardous to the aquatic environment

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

▼M2

Note 1:

When classifying substances as Acute Category 1 and/or Chronic Category 1 it is necessary at the same time to indicate the appropriate M-factor(s) (see Table 4.1.3).

Note 2:

Classification shall be based on the ErC50 [= EC50 (growth rate)]. In circumstances where the basis of the EC50 is not specified or no ErC50 is recorded, classification shall be based on the lowest EC50 available.

Note 3:

When no useful data on degradability are available, either experimentally determined or estimated data, the substance should be regarded as not rapidly degradable.

Note 4:

‘No acute toxicity’ is taken to mean that the L(E)C50(s) is/are above the water solubility. Also for poorly soluble substances, (water solubility < 1 mg/l), where there is evidence that the acute test does not provide a true measure of the intrinsic toxicity.

4.1.2.6.

The criteria for classifying and categorising substances as ‘hazardous to the aquatic environment’ are summarised in Table 4.1.0.

▼M12

Table 4.1.0

Classification categories for substances hazardous to the aquatic environment

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

▼M2

Note 1:

When classifying substances as Acute Category 1 and/or Chronic Category 1 it is necessary at the same time to indicate the appropriate M-factor(s) (see Table 4.1.3).

Note 2:

Classification shall be based on the ErC50 [= EC50 (growth rate)]. In circumstances where the basis of the EC50 is not specified or no ErC50 is recorded, classification shall be based on the lowest EC50 available.

Note 3:

When no useful data on degradability are available, either experimentally determined or estimated data, the substance should be regarded as not rapidly degradable.

Note 4:

‘No acute toxicity’ is taken to mean that the L(E)C50(s) is/are above the water solubility. Also for poorly soluble substances, (water solubility < 1 mg/l), where there is evidence that the acute test does not provide a true measure of the intrinsic toxicity.

4.1.2.6.

4.1.2.6.

The criteria for classifying and categorising substances as ‘hazardous to the aquatic environment’ are summarised in Table 4.1.0.

▼M12

Table 4.1.0

Classification categories for substances hazardous to the aquatic environment

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

▼M2

Note 1:

When classifying substances as Acute Category 1 and/or Chronic Category 1 it is necessary at the same time to indicate the appropriate M-factor(s) (see Table 4.1.3).

Note 2:

Classification shall be based on the ErC50 [= EC50 (growth rate)]. In circumstances where the basis of the EC50 is not specified or no ErC50 is recorded, classification shall be based on the lowest EC50 available.

Note 3:

When no useful data on degradability are available, either experimentally determined or estimated data, the substance should be regarded as not rapidly degradable.

Note 4:

‘No acute toxicity’ is taken to mean that the L(E)C50(s) is/are above the water solubility. Also for poorly soluble substances, (water solubility < 1 mg/l), where there is evidence that the acute test does not provide a true measure of the intrinsic toxicity.

The criteria for classifying and categorising substances as ‘hazardous to the aquatic environment’ are summarised in Table 4.1.0.

▼M12 ▼M12

Table 4.1.0

Classification categories for substances hazardous to the aquatic environment

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

Table 4.1.0 Table 4.1.0

Classification categories for substances hazardous to the aquatic environment Classification categories for substances hazardous to the aquatic environment

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

(a)  Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard

Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

Category Acute 1:

Category Acute 1: Category Acute 1: Category Acute 1:

(Note 1)

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

96 hr LC50 (for fish) 50

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) 50

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants) 50

≤ 1 mg/l.

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(Note 2)

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(b)  Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

(i)  Non-rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Category Chronic 1:

Category Chronic 1: Category Chronic 1: Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish) x

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea) x

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants) x

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Category Chronic 2:

Category Chronic 2: Category Chronic 2: Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish) x

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea) x

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants) x

≤ 1 mg/l.

≤ 1 mg/l.

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

(ii)  Rapidly degradable substances (Note 3) for which there are adequate chronic toxicity data available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Category Chronic 1:

Category Chronic 1: Category Chronic 1: Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

(Note 1)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish) x

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea) x

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

≤ 0,01 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants) x

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

≤ 0,01 mg/l.

Category Chronic 2:

Category Chronic 2:

Category Chronic 2: Category Chronic 2: Category Chronic 2:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish) x

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea) x

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

≤ 0,1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants) x

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

≤ 0,1 mg/l.

Category Chronic 3:

Category Chronic 3:

Category Chronic 3: Category Chronic 3: Category Chronic 3:

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for fish) x

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for crustacea) x

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants)

Chronic NOEC or ECx (for algae or other aquatic plants) x

≤ 1 mg/l.

≤ 1 mg/l.

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

(iii)  Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available

Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

Category Chronic 1:

Category Chronic 1: Category Chronic 1: Category Chronic 1:

(Note 1)

(Note 1)

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

96 hr LC50 (for fish) 50

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) 50

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

≤ 1 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants) 50

≤ 1 mg/l.

≤ 1 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4). ow

(Note 3).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 2:

Category Chronic 2:

Category Chronic 2: Category Chronic 2: Category Chronic 2:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

96 hr LC50 (for fish) 50

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) 50

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants) 50

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

> 1 to ≤ 10 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4). ow

(Note 3).

(Note 3).

Category Chronic 3:

Category Chronic 3:

Category Chronic 3: Category Chronic 3: Category Chronic 3:

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

96 hr LC50 (for fish)

96 hr LC50 (for fish) 50

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea)

48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) 50

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l and/or

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)

72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants) 50

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

> 10 to ≤ 100 mg/l.

(Note 2)

(Note 2)

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(Note 3).

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4).

(or, if absent, the log Kow ≥ 4). ow

(Note 3).

(Note 3).

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

‘Safety net’ classification

Category Chronic 4 Category Chronic 4 Category Chronic 4

Cases when data do not allow classification under the above criteria but there are nevertheless some grounds for concern. This includes, for example, poorly soluble substances for which no acute toxicity is recorded at levels up to the water solubility (note 4), and which are not rapidly degradable in accordance with Section 4.1.2.9.5 and have an experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, a log Kow ≥ 4), indicating a potential to bioaccumulate, which will be classified in this category unless other scientific evidence exists showing classification to be unnecessary. Such evidence includes chronic toxicity NOECs > water solubility or > 1 mg/l, or other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment than the ones provided by any of the methods listed in Section 4.1.2.9.5.

▼M2 ▼M2

Note 1:

When classifying substances as Acute Category 1 and/or Chronic Category 1 it is necessary at the same time to indicate the appropriate M-factor(s) (see Table 4.1.3).

Note 2:

Classification shall be based on the ErC50 [= EC50 (growth rate)]. In circumstances where the basis of the EC50 is not specified or no ErC50 is recorded, classification shall be based on the lowest EC50 available. 50 50 50 50 50

Note 3:

When no useful data on degradability are available, either experimentally determined or estimated data, the substance should be regarded as not rapidly degradable.

Note 4:

‘No acute toxicity’ is taken to mean that the L(E)C50(s) is/are above the water solubility. Also for poorly soluble substances, (water solubility < 1 mg/l), where there is evidence that the acute test does not provide a true measure of the intrinsic toxicity. 50

4.1.2.7.

Aquatic toxicity

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

4.1.2.7. Aquatic toxicity

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

4.1.2.7. Aquatic toxicity

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

4.1.2.7.

4.1.2.7. Aquatic toxicity

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

4.1.2.7.1.

4.1.2.7.1.

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2).

Acute aquatic toxicity is normally determined using a fish 96-hour LC50, a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 and/or an algal species 72- or 96-hour EC50. These species cover a range of trophic levels and taxa and are considered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms. Data on other species (e.g. Lemna spp.) shall also be considered if the test methodology is suitable. The aquatic plant growth inhibition tests are normally considered as chronic tests but the EC50s are treated as acute values for classification purposes (see note 2). 50 50 50 50

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

4.1.2.7.2.

4.1.2.7.2.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used.

For determining chronic aquatic toxicity for classification purposes data generated according to the standardised test methods referred to in Article 8(3) shall be accepted, as well as results obtained from other validated and internationally accepted test methods. The NOECs or other equivalent ECx (e.g. EC10) shall be used. x 10

4.1.2.8.

Bioaccumulation

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

4.1.2.8. Bioaccumulation

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

4.1.2.8. Bioaccumulation

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

4.1.2.8.

4.1.2.8. Bioaccumulation

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

4.1.2.8.1.

4.1.2.8.1.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden.

Bioaccumulation of substances within aquatic organisms can give rise to toxic effects over longer time scales even when actual water concentrations are low. For organic substances the potential for bioaccumulation shall normally be determined by using the octanol/water partition coefficient, usually reported as a log Kow. The relationship between the log Kow of an organic substance and its bioconcentration as measured by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish has considerable scientific literature support. Using a cut-off value of log Kow ≥ 4 is intended to identify only those substances with a real potential to bioconcentrate. While this represents a potential to bioaccumulate, an experimentally determined BCF provides a better measure and shall be used in preference if available. A BCF in fish of ≥ 500 is indicative of the potential to bioconcentrate for classification purposes. Some relationships can be observed between chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, as toxicity is related to the body burden. ow ow ow

4.1.2.9.

Rapid degradability of organic substances

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.9. Rapid degradability of organic substances

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.9. Rapid degradability of organic substances

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.9.

4.1.2.9. Rapid degradability of organic substances

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.1.

4.1.2.9.1.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

Substances that rapidly degrade can be quickly removed from the environment. While effects of such substances can occur, particularly in the event of a spillage or accident, they are localised and of short duration. In the absence of rapid degradation in the environment a substance in the water has the potential to exert toxicity over a wide temporal and spatial scale.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.2.

4.1.2.9.2.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

One way of demonstrating rapid degradation utilises the biodegradation screening tests designed to determine whether an organic substance is ‘readily biodegradable’. Where such data are not available, a BOD(5 days)/COD ratio ≥ 0,5 is considered as indicative of rapid degradation. Thus, a substance which passes this screening test is considered likely to biodegrade ‘rapidly’ in the aquatic environment, and is thus unlikely to be persistent. However, a fail in the screening test does not necessarily mean that the substance will not degrade rapidly in the environment. Other evidence of rapid degradation in the environment may therefore also be considered and are of particular importance where the substances are inhibitory to microbial activity at the concentration levels used in standard testing. Thus, a further classification criterion is included which allows the use of data to show that the substance did actually degrade biotically or abiotically in the aquatic environment by > 70 % in 28 days. Thus, if degradation is demonstrated under environmentally realistic conditions, then the criterion of ‘rapid degradability’ is met.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.3.

4.1.2.9.3.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

Many degradation data are available in the form of degradation half-lives and these can be used in defining rapid degradation provided that ultimate biodegradation of the substance, i.e. full mineralisation, is achieved. Primary biodegradation does not normally suffice in the assessment of rapid degradability unless it can be demonstrated that the degradation products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.4.

4.1.2.9.4.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

The criteria used reflect the fact that environmental degradation may be biotic or abiotic. Hydrolysis can be considered if the hydrolysis products do not fulfil the criteria for classification as hazardous to the aquatic environment.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.9.5.

4.1.2.9.5.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

Substances are considered rapidly degradable in the environment if one of the following criteria holds true:

(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(a) 
(a) 

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

if, in 28-day ready biodegradation studies, at least the following levels of degradation are achieved:

(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(i) 
(i) 

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

tests based on dissolved organic carbon: 70 %;

(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

(ii) 
(ii) 

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

tests based on oxygen depletion or carbon dioxide generation: 60 % of theoretical maximum.

These levels of biodegradation must be achieved within 10 days of the start of degradation which point is taken as the time when 10 % of the substance has been degraded, unless the substance is identified as an UVCB or as a complex, multi-constituent substance with structurally similar constituents. In this case, and where there is sufficient justification, the 10-day window condition may be waived and the pass level applied at 28 days; or

(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

(b) 
(b) 

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or

if, in those cases where only BOD and COD data are available, when the ratio of BOD5/COD is ≥ 0,5; or 5

(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

(c) 
(c) 

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

if other convincing scientific evidence is available to demonstrate that the substance can be degraded (biotically and/or abiotically) in the aquatic environment to a level > 70 % within a 28-day period.

4.1.2.10.

Inorganic compounds and metals

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.2.10. Inorganic compounds and metals

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.2.10. Inorganic compounds and metals

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.2.10.

4.1.2.10. Inorganic compounds and metals

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

4.1.2.10.1.

4.1.2.10.1.

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ).

For inorganic compounds and metals, the concept of degradability as applied to organic compounds has limited or no meaning. Rather, such substances may be transformed by normal environmental processes to either increase or decrease the bioavailability of the toxic species. Equally the use of bioaccumulation data shall be treated with care ( 19 ). 19 19

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.2.10.2.

4.1.2.10.2.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

Poorly soluble inorganic compounds and metals may be acutely or chronically toxic in the aquatic environment depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the bioavailable inorganic species and the rate and amount of this species which enter solution. All evidence must be weighed in a classification decision. This would be especially true for metals showing borderline results in the Transformation/Dissolution Protocol.

4.1.3.   Classification criteria for mixtures

Classification criteria for mixtures

4.1.3.1.

The classification system for mixtures covers all classification categories which are used for substances, i.e. categories Acute 1 and Chronic 1 to 4. In order to make use of all available data for purposes of classifying the aquatic environmental hazards of the mixture, the following is applied where appropriate:

The ‘relevant components’ of a mixture are those which are classified ‘Acute 1’or ‘Chronic 1’ and present in a concentration of 0,1 % (w/w) or greater, and those which are classified ‘Chronic 2’, ‘Chronic 3’ or ‘Chronic 4’ and present in a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or greater, unless there is a presumption (such as in the case of highly toxic components (see section 4.1.3.5.5.5)) that a component present in a lower concentration can still be relevant for classifying the mixture for aquatic environmental hazards. Generally, for substances classified as ‘Acute 1’ or ‘Chronic 1’ the concentration to be taken into account is (0,1/M) %. (For explanation M-factor see section 4.1.3.5.5.5.)

4.1.3.1.

The classification system for mixtures covers all classification categories which are used for substances, i.e. categories Acute 1 and Chronic 1 to 4. In order to make use of all available data for purposes of classifying the aquatic environmental hazards of the mixture, the following is applied where appropriate:

The ‘relevant components’ of a mixture are those which are classified ‘Acute 1’or ‘Chronic 1’ and present in a concentration of 0,1 % (w/w) or greater, and those which are classified ‘Chronic 2’, ‘Chronic 3’ or ‘Chronic 4’ and present in a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or greater, unless there is a presumption (such as in the case of highly toxic components (see section 4.1.3.5.5.5)) that a component present in a lower concentration can still be relevant for classifying the mixture for aquatic environmental hazards. Generally, for substances classified as ‘Acute 1’ or ‘Chronic 1’ the concentration to be taken into account is (0,1/M) %. (For explanation M-factor see section 4.1.3.5.5.5.)

4.1.3.1.

The classification system for mixtures covers all classification categories which are used for substances, i.e. categories Acute 1 and Chronic 1 to 4. In order to make use of all available data for purposes of classifying the aquatic environmental hazards of the mixture, the following is applied where appropriate:

The ‘relevant components’ of a mixture are those which are classified ‘Acute 1’or ‘Chronic 1’ and present in a concentration of 0,1 % (w/w) or greater, and those which are classified ‘Chronic 2’, ‘Chronic 3’ or ‘Chronic 4’ and present in a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or greater, unless there is a presumption (such as in the case of highly toxic components (see section 4.1.3.5.5.5)) that a component present in a lower concentration can still be relevant for classifying the mixture for aquatic environmental hazards. Generally, for substances classified as ‘Acute 1’ or ‘Chronic 1’ the concentration to be taken into account is (0,1/M) %. (For explanation M-factor see section 4.1.3.5.5.5.)

4.1.3.1.

4.1.3.1.

The classification system for mixtures covers all classification categories which are used for substances, i.e. categories Acute 1 and Chronic 1 to 4. In order to make use of all available data for purposes of classifying the aquatic environmental hazards of the mixture, the following is applied where appropriate:

The ‘relevant components’ of a mixture are those which are classified ‘Acute 1’or ‘Chronic 1’ and present in a concentration of 0,1 % (w/w) or greater, and those which are classified ‘Chronic 2’, ‘Chronic 3’ or ‘Chronic 4’ and present in a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or greater, unless there is a presumption (such as in the case of highly toxic components (see section 4.1.3.5.5.5)) that a component present in a lower concentration can still be relevant for classifying the mixture for aquatic environmental hazards. Generally, for substances classified as ‘Acute 1’ or ‘Chronic 1’ the concentration to be taken into account is (0,1/M) %. (For explanation M-factor see section 4.1.3.5.5.5.)

The classification system for mixtures covers all classification categories which are used for substances, i.e. categories Acute 1 and Chronic 1 to 4. In order to make use of all available data for purposes of classifying the aquatic environmental hazards of the mixture, the following is applied where appropriate:

The ‘relevant components’ of a mixture are those which are classified ‘Acute 1’or ‘Chronic 1’ and present in a concentration of 0,1 % (w/w) or greater, and those which are classified ‘Chronic 2’, ‘Chronic 3’ or ‘Chronic 4’ and present in a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or greater, unless there is a presumption (such as in the case of highly toxic components (see section 4.1.3.5.5.5)) that a component present in a lower concentration can still be relevant for classifying the mixture for aquatic environmental hazards. Generally, for substances classified as ‘Acute 1’ or ‘Chronic 1’ the concentration to be taken into account is (0,1/M) %. (For explanation M-factor see section 4.1.3.5.5.5.)

4.1.3.2.

The approach for classification of aquatic environmental hazards is tiered, and is dependent upon the type of information available for the mixture itself and for its components. Figure 4.1.2 outlines the process to be followed.

Elements of the tiered approach include:

— 
classification based on tested mixtures,
— 
classification based on bridging principles,
— 
the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.

▼M12

Figure 4.1.2

Tiered approach to classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) aquatic environmental hazards image

Text of image

▼M2

4.1.3.2.

The approach for classification of aquatic environmental hazards is tiered, and is dependent upon the type of information available for the mixture itself and for its components. Figure 4.1.2 outlines the process to be followed.

Elements of the tiered approach include:

— 
classification based on tested mixtures,
— 
classification based on bridging principles,
— 
the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.

▼M12

Figure 4.1.2

Tiered approach to classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) aquatic environmental hazards image

Text of image

▼M2

4.1.3.2.

The approach for classification of aquatic environmental hazards is tiered, and is dependent upon the type of information available for the mixture itself and for its components. Figure 4.1.2 outlines the process to be followed.

Elements of the tiered approach include:

— 
classification based on tested mixtures,
— 
classification based on bridging principles,
— 
the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.

▼M12

Figure 4.1.2

Tiered approach to classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) aquatic environmental hazards image

Text of image

▼M2

4.1.3.2.

4.1.3.2.

The approach for classification of aquatic environmental hazards is tiered, and is dependent upon the type of information available for the mixture itself and for its components. Figure 4.1.2 outlines the process to be followed.

Elements of the tiered approach include:

— 
classification based on tested mixtures,
— 
classification based on bridging principles,
— 
the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.

▼M12

Figure 4.1.2

Tiered approach to classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) aquatic environmental hazards image

Text of image

▼M2

The approach for classification of aquatic environmental hazards is tiered, and is dependent upon the type of information available for the mixture itself and for its components. Figure 4.1.2 outlines the process to be followed.

Elements of the tiered approach include:

— 
classification based on tested mixtures,
— 
— 
classification based on tested mixtures,
classification based on tested mixtures,
— 
classification based on bridging principles,
— 
— 
classification based on bridging principles,
classification based on bridging principles,
— 
the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.
— 
— 
the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.
the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.

▼M12 ▼M12

Figure 4.1.2 Figure 4.1.2

Tiered approach to classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) aquatic environmental hazards Tiered approach to classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) aquatic environmental hazards image

Text of image Text of image

Apply summation method (see 4.1.3.5.5) using:

·

Percentage of all components classified as "Chronic"

·

Percentage of components classified as "Acute"

·

Percentage of components with acute or chronic toxicity data: apply additivity formulas (see 4.1.3.5.2) and convert the derived L(E)C50 or EqNOECm to the appropriate "Acute" or "Chronic" category

CLASSIFY

for short-term (acute)/long-term chronic hazard

CLASSIFY

for short-term (acute)/long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard

CLASSIFY

for short-term(acute)/long-term (chronic)aquatic hazard (see 4.1.3.3)

Apply bridging principles (see 4.1.3.4.)

CLASSIFY

for short-term (acute)/long-term (chronic) hazard

Apply summation method and/or additivity formula (see 4.1.3.5) and apply 4.1.3.6

Use available hazard data of known components

Either aquatic toxicity or classification data available for all relevant components

Sufficient data available on similar mixtures to estimate hazards

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Aquatic toxicity test data available on the mixture as a whole

▼M2 ▼M2

4.1.3.3.

Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for the complete mixture

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

4.1.3.3.3.

Classification for category Acute 1
(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.4.

Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3
(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.5.

Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.3. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for the complete mixture

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

4.1.3.3.3.

Classification for category Acute 1
(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.4.

Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3
(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.5.

Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.3. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for the complete mixture

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

4.1.3.3.3.

Classification for category Acute 1
(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.4.

Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3
(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.5.

Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.3.

4.1.3.3. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for the complete mixture

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

4.1.3.3.3.

Classification for category Acute 1
(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.4.

Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3
(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.5.

Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.1.

4.1.3.3.1.

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5).

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

4.1.3.3.2.

4.1.3.3.2.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances.

►M12  The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances. ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

4.1.3.3.3.

Classification for category Acute 1
(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.3. Classification for category Acute 1

(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.3. Classification for category Acute 1

(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.3.

4.1.3.3.3. Classification for category Acute 1

(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(a) 
(a) 

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l:

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l: 50 50 50

Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0.

(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

(b) 
(b) 

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2

When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels: 50 50 50

▼M12 ▼M12

No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard.

▼M2 ▼M2

4.1.3.3.4.

Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3
(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.4. Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3

(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.4. Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3

(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

4.1.3.3.4.

4.1.3.3.4. Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3

(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(a) 
(a) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l:

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l: x x

(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(i) 
(i) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable;

(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(ii) 
(ii) 

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable;

(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

(b) 
(b) 

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels:

▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2

When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels: x x

▼M12 ▼M12

No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

▼M2 ▼M2

4.1.3.3.5.

Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.3.5. Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.3.5. Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.3.5.

4.1.3.3.5. Classification for category Chronic 4

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

If there are nevertheless reasons for concern:

Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0.

4.1.3.4.

Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

▼M4

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

▼M2

4.1.3.4. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

▼M4

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

▼M2

4.1.3.4. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

▼M4

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

▼M2

4.1.3.4.

4.1.3.4. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

▼M4

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

▼M2

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.1.

4.1.3.4.1.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

4.1.3.4.2.

4.1.3.4.2.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied.

▼M4 ▼M4

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

4.1.3.4.3.

4.1.3.4.3.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance.

▼M2 ▼M2

4.1.3.5.

Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for some or all components of the mixture

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.5.

Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for some or all components of the mixture

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.5.

Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for some or all components of the mixture

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.5.

Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.

4.1.3.5. Classification of mixtures when toxicity data are available for some or all components of the mixture

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.5.

Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.1.

4.1.3.5.1.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.2.

4.1.3.5.2.

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data:

(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

(a) 
(a) 

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2

Based on acute aquatic toxicity:

image image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

Ci

Ci i

=

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

concentration of component i (weight percentage);

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

L(E)C50i

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

L(E)C50i

L(E)C50i 50i

=

=

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i;

(mg/l) LC50 or EC50 for component i; 50 50

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

η

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

η

η

=

=

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

number of components, and i is running from 1 to n;

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

L(E)C50m

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

L(E)C50m

L(E)C50m 50m

=

=

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data.

L(E) C50 of the part of the mixture with test data. 50

▼M12 ▼M12

The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method;

▼M2 ▼M2

(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

(b) 
(b) 

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2

Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:

image image

where:

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Ci

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Ci

Ci i

=

=

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

concentration of component i (weight percentage) covering the rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

Cj

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

Cj

Cj

=

=

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

concentration of component j (weight percentage) covering the non- rapidly degradable components;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECi

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECi

NOECi

=

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component i covering the rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOECj

NOECj

=

=

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

NOEC (or other recognised measures for chronic toxicity) for component j covering the non-rapidly degradable components, in mg/l;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

n

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

n

n

=

=

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

number of components, and i and j are running from 1 to n;

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

EqNOECm

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

EqNOECm

EqNOECm

=

=

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

Equivalent NOEC of the part of the mixture with test data.

The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances.

▼M12 ▼M12

The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method.

▼M2 ▼M2

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.3.

4.1.3.5.3.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.4.

4.1.3.5.4.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used.

4.1.3.5.5.

Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5. Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5. Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5. Summation method

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.1.   Rationale Rationale

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

4.1.3.5.5.1.1.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

In case of the substance classification categories Chronic 1 to Chronic 3, the underlying toxicity criteria differ by a factor of 10 in moving from one category to another. Substances with a classification in a high toxicity band therefore contribute to the classification of a mixture in a lower band. The calculation of these classification categories therefore needs to consider the contribution of any substance classified as Chronic 1, 2 or 3.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

4.1.3.5.5.1.2.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

When a mixture contains components classified as Acute 1 or Chronic 1, attention must be paid to the fact that such components, when their acute toxicity is below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicity is below 0,1 mg/l (if non rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration. Active ingredients in pesticides often possess such high aquatic toxicity but also some other substances like organometallic compounds. Under these circumstances the application of the normal generic concentration limits leads to an ‘under-classification’ of the mixture. Therefore, multiplying factors shall be applied to account for highly toxic components, as described in section 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.2.   Classification procedure Classification procedure

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

4.1.3.5.5.2.1.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

In general a more severe classification for mixtures overrides a less severe classification, e.g. a classification with Chronic 1 overrides a classification with Chronic 2. As a consequence, in this example, the classification procedure is already completed if the result of the classification is Chronic 1. A more severe classification than Chronic 1 is not possible. Therefore it is not necessary to undergo the further classification procedure.

4.1.3.5.5.3.   Classification for category Acute 1 Classification for category Acute 1

▼M19 ▼M19

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

4.1.3.5.5.3.1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

First, all components classified as Acute 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is ≥ 25 % the whole mixture is classified as Acute 1.

▼M2 ▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

4.1.3.5.5.3.2.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) hazards based on this summation of classified components is summarised in Table 4.1.1. ◄ ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

Table 4.1.1

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

Table 4.1.1

▼M12 ▼M12

Classification of a mixture for short-term (acute) hazards based on summation of classified components

▼M2 ▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Sum of components classified as:

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Acute 1 × M () ≥ 25 % ()

Acute 1

Acute 1

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

(1)    1

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.   Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

4.1.3.5.5.4.1.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

First all components classified as Chronic 1 are considered. If the sum of the concentrations (in %) of these components multiplied by their corresponding M-factors is equal to or greater than 25 %, the mixture is classified as Chronic 1. If the result of the calculation is a classification of the mixture as Chronic 1, the classification procedure is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

4.1.3.5.5.4.2.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

In cases where the mixture is not classified as Chronic 1, classification of the mixture as Chronic 2 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 2 if 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 2 is equal to or greater than 25 %. If the result of the calculation is classification of the mixture as Chronic 2, the classification process is completed.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

4.1.3.5.5.4.3.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

In cases where the mixture is not classified either as Chronic 1 or Chronic 2, classification of the mixture as Chronic 3 is considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 3 if 100 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 1 multiplied by their corresponding M-factors plus 10 times the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified with Chronic 2 plus the sum of the concentrations (in %) of all components classified as Chronic 3 is ≥ 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

4.1.3.5.5.4.4.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

If the mixture is still not classified in Chronic 1, 2 or 3, classification of the mixture as Chronic 4 shall be considered. A mixture is classified as Chronic 4 if the sum of the concentrations (in %) of components classified as Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to or greater than 25 %.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

4.1.3.5.5.4.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

►M12  The classification of mixtures for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on this summation of the concentrations of classified components, is summarised in Table 4.1.2. ◄ ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

Table 4.1.2

▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

Table 4.1.2

▼M12 ▼M12

Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components Classification of a mixture for long-term (chronic) hazards, based on summation of the concentration of classified components

▼M2 ▼M2

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Sum of components classified as:

Sum of components classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Mixture is classified as:

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1 × M () ≥ 25 % ()

Chronic 1

Chronic 1

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

(M × 10 × Chronic 1) + Chronic 2 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 2

Chronic 2

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

(M × 100 × Chronic 1) + (10 × Chronic 2) + Chronic 3 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 3

Chronic 3

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 1 + Chronic 2 + Chronic 3 + Chronic 4 ≥ 25 %

Chronic 4

Chronic 4

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

(1)   

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

(1)    1

For explanation of the M-factor, see 4.1.3.5.5.5.

4.1.3.5.5.5.   Mixtures with highly toxic components Mixtures with highly toxic components

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

4.1.3.5.5.5.1.

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2

Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components with toxicities below 1 mg/l and/or chronic toxicities below 0,1 mg/l (if non-rapidly degradable) and 0,01 mg/l (if rapidly degradable) contribute to the toxicity of the mixture even at a low concentration and shall normally be given increased weight in applying the summation of classification approach. When a mixture contains components classified as Acute or Chronic 1, one of the following shall be applied:

— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
— 
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
the tiered approach described in sections 4.1.3.5.5.3 and 4.1.3.5.5.4 using a weighted sum by multiplying the concentrations of Acute 1 and Chronic 1 components by a factor, instead of merely adding up the percentages. This means that the concentration of ‘Acute 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.1 and the concentration of ‘Chronic 1’ in the left column of Table 4.1.2 are multiplied by the appropriate multiplying factor. The multiplying factors to be applied to these components are defined using the toxicity value, as summarised in Table 4.1.3. Therefore, in order to classify a mixture containing Acute/Chronic 1 components, the classifier needs to be informed of the value of the M-factor in order to apply the summation method,
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.
— 
— 
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.
the additivity formula (see section 4.1.3.5.2) provided that toxicity data are available for all highly toxic components in the mixture and there is convincing evidence that all other components, including those for which specific acute and/or chronic toxicity data are not available, are of low or no toxicity and do not significantly contribute to the environmental hazard of the mixture.

▼M4 ▼M4

Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

Table 4.1.3 Table 4.1.3

Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures Multiplying factors for highly toxic components of mixtures

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

Acute toxicity

M factor

Chronic toxicity

M factor

Acute toxicity

Acute toxicity

M factor

M factor

Chronic toxicity

Chronic toxicity

M factor

M factor

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

RD () components

L(E)C50 value (mg/l)

L(E)C50 value (mg/l) 50

 

 

NOEC value (mg/l)

NOEC value (mg/l)

NRD () components

NRD () components ()

RD () components

RD () components ()

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1

0,1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1 50

1

1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

0,01 < NOEC ≤ 0,1

1

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1

0,01 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,1 50

10

10

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

0,001 < NOEC ≤ 0,01

10

10

1

1

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

10

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01

0,001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,01 50

100

100

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

0,0001 < NOEC ≤ 0,001

100

100

10

10

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

100

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001

0,0001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,001 50

1 000

1 000

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

0,00001 < NOEC ≤ 0,0001

1 000

1 000

100

100

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

1 000

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001

0,00001 < L(E)C50 ≤ 0,0001 50

10 000

10 000

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

0,000001 < NOEC ≤ 0,00001

10 000

10 000

1 000

1 000

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(continue in factor 10 intervals)

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

(1)   

Non-rapidly degradable.

(1)    1

Non-rapidly degradable.

(2)   

Rapidly degradable.

(2)    2

Rapidly degradable.

▼M2 ▼M2

4.1.3.6.

Classification of mixtures with components without any useable information

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

4.1.3.6. Classification of mixtures with components without any useable information

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

4.1.3.6. Classification of mixtures with components without any useable information

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

4.1.3.6.

4.1.3.6. Classification of mixtures with components without any useable information

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

4.1.3.6.1.

4.1.3.6.1.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’.

►M12  In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’. ►M12 ►M12 ►M12  ◄

4.1.4.   Hazard communication

Hazard communication

4.1.4.1.

Label elements shall be used for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class in accordance with Table 4.1.4.

▼M12

Table 4.1.4

Label elements for hazardous to the aquatic environment

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

4.1.4.1.

Label elements shall be used for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class in accordance with Table 4.1.4.

▼M12

Table 4.1.4

Label elements for hazardous to the aquatic environment

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

4.1.4.1.

Label elements shall be used for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class in accordance with Table 4.1.4.

▼M12

Table 4.1.4

Label elements for hazardous to the aquatic environment

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

4.1.4.1.

4.1.4.1.

Label elements shall be used for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class in accordance with Table 4.1.4.

▼M12

Table 4.1.4

Label elements for hazardous to the aquatic environment

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

Label elements shall be used for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class in accordance with Table 4.1.4.

▼M12 ▼M12

Table 4.1.4

Label elements for hazardous to the aquatic environment

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

Table 4.1.4 Table 4.1.4

Label elements for hazardous to the aquatic environment Label elements for hazardous to the aquatic environment

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

SHORT-TERM (ACUTE) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Acute 1

 

 

Acute 1

Acute 1

GHS Pictogram

image

GHS Pictogram

GHS Pictogram

image

image image

Signal Word

Warning

Signal Word

Signal Word

Warning

Warning

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Hazard Statement

Hazard Statement

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

H400: Very toxic to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

Precautionary Statement Prevention

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

Precautionary Statement Response

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

Precautionary Statement Disposal

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

LONG-TERM (CHRONIC) AQUATIC HAZARD

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

 

 

Chronic 1

Chronic 1

Chronic 2

Chronic 2

Chronic 3

Chronic 3

Chronic 4

Chronic 4

GHS Pictograms

image

image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

GHS Pictograms

GHS Pictograms

image

image image

image

image image

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

No pictogram is used

Signal Word

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Signal Word

Signal Word

Warning

Warning

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

No signal word is used

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Hazard Statement

Hazard Statement

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

H413: May cause long lasting harmful effects to aquatic life

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Prevention

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P273

P273

P273

P273

P273

P273

P273

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

 

 

Precautionary Statement Response

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

P391

P391

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Storage

Precautionary Statement Storage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

Precautionary Statement Disposal

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

P501

P501

P501

P501

▼M32 ▼M32

4.2.    Endocrine disruption for the environment

Endocrine disruption for the environment Endocrine disruption for the environment

4.2.1.    Definitions and general considerations

Definitions and general considerations Definitions and general considerations Definitions and general considerations

4.2.1.1.    Definitions Definitions Definitions

For the purposes of Section 4.2., the following definitions shall apply:

(a) 

‘endocrine disruptor’ means a substance or a mixture that alters one or more functions of the endocrine system and consequently causes adverse effects in an intact organism, its progeny, populations or subpopulations;

(a) 
(a) 

‘endocrine disruptor’ means a substance or a mixture that alters one or more functions of the endocrine system and consequently causes adverse effects in an intact organism, its progeny, populations or subpopulations;

‘endocrine disruptor’ means a substance or a mixture that alters one or more functions of the endocrine system and consequently causes adverse effects in an intact organism, its progeny, populations or subpopulations;

(b) 

‘endocrine disruption’ means the alteration of one or more functions of the endocrine system caused by an endocrine disruptor;

(b) 
(b) 

‘endocrine disruption’ means the alteration of one or more functions of the endocrine system caused by an endocrine disruptor;

‘endocrine disruption’ means the alteration of one or more functions of the endocrine system caused by an endocrine disruptor;

(c) 

‘endocrine activity’ means an interaction with the endocrine system that may result in a response of that system, of target organs or target tissues and that confers on a substance or mixture the potential to alter one or more functions of the endocrine system;

(c) 
(c) 

‘endocrine activity’ means an interaction with the endocrine system that may result in a response of that system, of target organs or target tissues and that confers on a substance or mixture the potential to alter one or more functions of the endocrine system;

‘endocrine activity’ means an interaction with the endocrine system that may result in a response of that system, of target organs or target tissues and that confers on a substance or mixture the potential to alter one or more functions of the endocrine system;

(d) 

‘adverse effect’ means a change in morphology, physiology, growth, development, reproduction or lifespan of an organism, system, population or subpopulation that results in an impairment of functional capacity, an impairment of the capacity to compensate for additional stress or an increase in susceptibility to other influences;

(d) 
(d) 

‘adverse effect’ means a change in morphology, physiology, growth, development, reproduction or lifespan of an organism, system, population or subpopulation that results in an impairment of functional capacity, an impairment of the capacity to compensate for additional stress or an increase in susceptibility to other influences;

‘adverse effect’ means a change in morphology, physiology, growth, development, reproduction or lifespan of an organism, system, population or subpopulation that results in an impairment of functional capacity, an impairment of the capacity to compensate for additional stress or an increase in susceptibility to other influences;

(e) 

‘biologically plausible link’ means the correlation between an endocrine activity and an adverse effect, based on biological processes, where the correlation is consistent with existing scientific knowledge.

(e) 
(e) 

‘biologically plausible link’ means the correlation between an endocrine activity and an adverse effect, based on biological processes, where the correlation is consistent with existing scientific knowledge.

‘biologically plausible link’ means the correlation between an endocrine activity and an adverse effect, based on biological processes, where the correlation is consistent with existing scientific knowledge.

4.2.1.2.    General considerations General considerations General considerations

4.2.1.2.1 Substances and mixtures fulfilling the criteria of endocrine disruptors for the environment based on evidence referred to in Table 4.2.1 shall be considered to be known, presumed or suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment unless there is evidence conclusively demonstrating that the adverse effects identified are not relevant at the population or subpopulation level.

4.2.1.2.1 Substances and mixtures fulfilling the criteria of endocrine disruptors for the environment based on evidence referred to in Table 4.2.1 shall be considered to be known, presumed or suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment unless there is evidence conclusively demonstrating that the adverse effects identified are not relevant at the population or subpopulation level.  

4.2.1.2.2 Evidence that is to be considered for classification of substances in accordance with other Sections of this Annex may also be used for classification of substances as an endocrine disruptor for the environment where the criteria provided in this Section are met.

4.2.1.2.2 Evidence that is to be considered for classification of substances in accordance with other Sections of this Annex may also be used for classification of substances as an endocrine disruptor for the environment where the criteria provided in this Section are met.  

4.2.2    Classification criteria for substances

Classification criteria for substances Classification criteria for substances Classification criteria for substances

4.2.2.1    Hazard categories Hazard categories Hazard categories

For the purpose of classification for endocrine disruption for the environment, substances shall be allocated to one of two categories.

Table 4.2.1.

Hazard categories for endocrine disruptors for the environment

Categories

Criteria

CATEGORY 1

Known or presumed endocrine disruptors for the environment

The classification in Category 1 shall be largely based on evidence from at least one of the following:

a)  animal data;

b)  non-animal data providing an equivalent predictive capacity as data in point a.

Such data shall provide evidence that the substance meets all the following criteria:

(a)  endocrine activity;

(b)  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(c)  a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

However, where there is information that raises serious doubt about the relevance of the adverse effects identified at population or subpopulation level, classification in Category 2 may be more appropriate.

CATEGORY 2

Suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment

A substance shall be classified in Category 2 where all the following criteria are met:

(a)  there is evidence of:

i.  an endocrine activity; and

ii.  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(b)  the evidence referred to in point (a) is not sufficiently convincing to classify the substance in Category 1;

(c)  there is evidence of a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

Table 4.2.1. Table 4.2.1.

Hazard categories for endocrine disruptors for the environment Hazard categories for endocrine disruptors for the environment

Categories

Criteria

CATEGORY 1

Known or presumed endocrine disruptors for the environment

The classification in Category 1 shall be largely based on evidence from at least one of the following:

a)  animal data;

b)  non-animal data providing an equivalent predictive capacity as data in point a.

Such data shall provide evidence that the substance meets all the following criteria:

(a)  endocrine activity;

(b)  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(c)  a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

However, where there is information that raises serious doubt about the relevance of the adverse effects identified at population or subpopulation level, classification in Category 2 may be more appropriate.

CATEGORY 2

Suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment

A substance shall be classified in Category 2 where all the following criteria are met:

(a)  there is evidence of:

i.  an endocrine activity; and

ii.  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(b)  the evidence referred to in point (a) is not sufficiently convincing to classify the substance in Category 1;

(c)  there is evidence of a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

Categories

Criteria

CATEGORY 1

Known or presumed endocrine disruptors for the environment

The classification in Category 1 shall be largely based on evidence from at least one of the following:

a)  animal data;

b)  non-animal data providing an equivalent predictive capacity as data in point a.

Such data shall provide evidence that the substance meets all the following criteria:

(a)  endocrine activity;

(b)  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(c)  a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

However, where there is information that raises serious doubt about the relevance of the adverse effects identified at population or subpopulation level, classification in Category 2 may be more appropriate.

CATEGORY 2

Suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment

A substance shall be classified in Category 2 where all the following criteria are met:

(a)  there is evidence of:

i.  an endocrine activity; and

ii.  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(b)  the evidence referred to in point (a) is not sufficiently convincing to classify the substance in Category 1;

(c)  there is evidence of a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

Categories

Criteria

Categories

Categories

Criteria

Criteria

CATEGORY 1

Known or presumed endocrine disruptors for the environment

The classification in Category 1 shall be largely based on evidence from at least one of the following:

a)  animal data;

b)  non-animal data providing an equivalent predictive capacity as data in point a.

Such data shall provide evidence that the substance meets all the following criteria:

(a)  endocrine activity;

(b)  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(c)  a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

However, where there is information that raises serious doubt about the relevance of the adverse effects identified at population or subpopulation level, classification in Category 2 may be more appropriate.

CATEGORY 1

CATEGORY 1

Known or presumed endocrine disruptors for the environment

The classification in Category 1 shall be largely based on evidence from at least one of the following:

a)  animal data;

b)  non-animal data providing an equivalent predictive capacity as data in point a.

Such data shall provide evidence that the substance meets all the following criteria:

(a)  endocrine activity;

(b)  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(c)  a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

However, where there is information that raises serious doubt about the relevance of the adverse effects identified at population or subpopulation level, classification in Category 2 may be more appropriate.

Known or presumed endocrine disruptors for the environment

The classification in Category 1 shall be largely based on evidence from at least one of the following:

a)  animal data;

b)  non-animal data providing an equivalent predictive capacity as data in point a.

Such data shall provide evidence that the substance meets all the following criteria:

(a)  endocrine activity;

(b)  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(c)  a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

However, where there is information that raises serious doubt about the relevance of the adverse effects identified at population or subpopulation level, classification in Category 2 may be more appropriate.

CATEGORY 2

Suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment

A substance shall be classified in Category 2 where all the following criteria are met:

(a)  there is evidence of:

i.  an endocrine activity; and

ii.  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(b)  the evidence referred to in point (a) is not sufficiently convincing to classify the substance in Category 1;

(c)  there is evidence of a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

CATEGORY 2

CATEGORY 2

Suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment

A substance shall be classified in Category 2 where all the following criteria are met:

(a)  there is evidence of:

i.  an endocrine activity; and

ii.  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(b)  the evidence referred to in point (a) is not sufficiently convincing to classify the substance in Category 1;

(c)  there is evidence of a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

Suspected endocrine disruptors for the environment

A substance shall be classified in Category 2 where all the following criteria are met:

(a)  there is evidence of:

i.  an endocrine activity; and

ii.  an adverse effect in an intact organism or its offspring or future generations;

(b)  the evidence referred to in point (a) is not sufficiently convincing to classify the substance in Category 1;

(c)  there is evidence of a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect.

Where there is evidence conclusively demonstrating that the adverse effects identified are not relevant at the population or subpopulation level, the substance shall not be considered an endocrine disruptor for the environment.

4.2.2.2.    Basis of classification Basis of classification Basis of classification

4.2.2.2.1 Classification shall be made on the basis of the appropriate criteria outlined above, and a weight of evidence determination of each of the criteria (see Section 4.2.2.3) and an overall weight of evidence determination (see Section 1.1.1). Classification as an endocrine disruptor for the environment is intended to be used for substances which cause or may cause an endocrine-related adverse effect at population or subpopulation level.

4.2.2.2.1 Classification shall be made on the basis of the appropriate criteria outlined above, and a weight of evidence determination of each of the criteria (see Section 4.2.2.3) and an overall weight of evidence determination (see Section 1.1.1). Classification as an endocrine disruptor for the environment is intended to be used for substances which cause or may cause an endocrine-related adverse effect at population or subpopulation level.  

4.2.2.2.2 Adverse effects that are solely non-specific consequences of other toxic effects shall not be considered for the identification of a substance as endocrine disruptor for the environment.

4.2.2.2.2 Adverse effects that are solely non-specific consequences of other toxic effects shall not be considered for the identification of a substance as endocrine disruptor for the environment.  

4.2.2.3.    Weight of evidence and expert judgment Weight of evidence and expert judgment Weight of evidence and expert judgment

4.2.2.3.1. Classification as an endocrine disruptor for the environment is made on the basis of an assessment of the total weight of evidence using expert judgment (see Section 1.1.1). This means that all available information that bears on the determination of endocrine disruption for the environment is considered together, such as:

4.2.2.3.1. Classification as an endocrine disruptor for the environment is made on the basis of an assessment of the total weight of evidence using expert judgment (see Section 1.1.1). This means that all available information that bears on the determination of endocrine disruption for the environment is considered together, such as:  

(a) 

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies) predictive of adverse effects, endocrine activity or biologically plausible link in animals;

(a) 
(a) 

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies) predictive of adverse effects, endocrine activity or biologically plausible link in animals;

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies) predictive of adverse effects, endocrine activity or biologically plausible link in animals;

(b) 

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR),

(b) 
(b) 

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR),

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR),

(c) 

evaluation of substances chemically related to the substance under study may also be included (grouping, read-across), particularly when information on the substance is scarce;

(c) 
(c) 

evaluation of substances chemically related to the substance under study may also be included (grouping, read-across), particularly when information on the substance is scarce;

evaluation of substances chemically related to the substance under study may also be included (grouping, read-across), particularly when information on the substance is scarce;

(d) 

any additional relevant and acceptable scientific data.

(d) 
(d) 

any additional relevant and acceptable scientific data.

any additional relevant and acceptable scientific data.

4.2.2.3.2. In applying the weight of evidence determination and expert judgement, the assessment of the scientific evidence referred to in Section 4.2.2.3.1 shall, in particular, consider all of the following factors:

4.2.2.3.2. In applying the weight of evidence determination and expert judgement, the assessment of the scientific evidence referred to in Section 4.2.2.3.1 shall, in particular, consider all of the following factors:  

(a) 

both positive and negative results;

(a) 
(a) 

both positive and negative results;

both positive and negative results;

(b) 

the relevance of the study design for the assessment of adverse effects and its relevance at the population or subpopulation level, and for the assessment of the endocrine activity;

(b) 
(b) 

the relevance of the study design for the assessment of adverse effects and its relevance at the population or subpopulation level, and for the assessment of the endocrine activity;

the relevance of the study design for the assessment of adverse effects and its relevance at the population or subpopulation level, and for the assessment of the endocrine activity;

(c) 

the adverse effects on reproduction, growth/development, and other relevant adverse effects which are likely to impact on populations or subpopulations;

(c) 
(c) 

the adverse effects on reproduction, growth/development, and other relevant adverse effects which are likely to impact on populations or subpopulations;

the adverse effects on reproduction, growth/development, and other relevant adverse effects which are likely to impact on populations or subpopulations;

(d) 

the quality and consistency of the data, considering the pattern and coherence of the results within and between studies of a similar design and across different species;

(d) 
(d) 

the quality and consistency of the data, considering the pattern and coherence of the results within and between studies of a similar design and across different species;

the quality and consistency of the data, considering the pattern and coherence of the results within and between studies of a similar design and across different species;

(e) 

the route of exposure, toxicokinetic and metabolism studies;

(e) 
(e) 

the route of exposure, toxicokinetic and metabolism studies;

the route of exposure, toxicokinetic and metabolism studies;

(f) 

the concept of the limit dose (concentration), and international guidelines on maximum recommended doses (concentrations) and for assessing confounding effects of excessive toxicity;

(f) 
(f) 

the concept of the limit dose (concentration), and international guidelines on maximum recommended doses (concentrations) and for assessing confounding effects of excessive toxicity;

the concept of the limit dose (concentration), and international guidelines on maximum recommended doses (concentrations) and for assessing confounding effects of excessive toxicity;

(g) 

where available, adequate, reliable and representative field or monitoring data or results from population models.

(g) 
(g) 

where available, adequate, reliable and representative field or monitoring data or results from population models.

where available, adequate, reliable and representative field or monitoring data or results from population models.

4.2.2.3.3. Using a weight of evidence determination, the link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effects shall be established based on biological plausibility, which shall be determined in light of available scientific knowledge. The biologically plausible link does not need to be demonstrated with substance specific data.

4.2.2.3.3. Using a weight of evidence determination, the link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effects shall be established based on biological plausibility, which shall be determined in light of available scientific knowledge. The biologically plausible link does not need to be demonstrated with substance specific data.  

4.2.2.3.4. Using a weight of evidence determination, evidence considered for the classification of a substance as an endocrine disruptor for human health referred to in Section 3.11 shall be considered when assessing the classification of the substance as an endocrine disruptor for the environment under Section 4.2.

4.2.2.3.4. Using a weight of evidence determination, evidence considered for the classification of a substance as an endocrine disruptor for human health referred to in Section 3.11 shall be considered when assessing the classification of the substance as an endocrine disruptor for the environment under Section 4.2.  

4.2.2.4.    Application in time Application in time Application in time

From 1 May 2025 at the latest, substances shall be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.2.2.1 to 4.2.2.3.

However, substances which were placed on the market before 1 May 2025 are not required to be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.2.2.1 to 4.2.2.3 until 1 November 2026.

4.2.3.    Classification criteria for mixtures

Classification criteria for mixtures Classification criteria for mixtures Classification criteria for mixtures

4.2.3.1.    Classification of mixtures where data are available for all components or only for some components of the mixture Classification of mixtures where data are available for all components or only for some components of the mixture Classification of mixtures where data are available for all components or only for some components of the mixture

4.2.3.1.1. A mixture shall be classified as an endocrine disruptor for the environment where at least one component has been classified as a Category 1 or Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment and is present at or above the appropriate generic concentration limit as shown in Table 4.2.2 for Category 1 and Category 2, respectively.

4.2.3.1.1. A mixture shall be classified as an endocrine disruptor for the environment where at least one component has been classified as a Category 1 or Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment and is present at or above the appropriate generic concentration limit as shown in Table 4.2.2 for Category 1 and Category 2, respectively.  

Table 4.2.2.

Generic concentration limits of components of a mixture classified as endocrine disruptor for the environment that trigger classification of the mixture

Component classified as:

Generic concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as:

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

≥ 0,1  %

 

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

 

≥ 1  %

[Note 1 ]

Table 4.2.2. Table 4.2.2.

Generic concentration limits of components of a mixture classified as endocrine disruptor for the environment that trigger classification of the mixture Generic concentration limits of components of a mixture classified as endocrine disruptor for the environment that trigger classification of the mixture

Component classified as:

Generic concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as:

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

≥ 0,1  %

 

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

 

≥ 1  %

[Note 1 ]

Component classified as:

Generic concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as:

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

≥ 0,1  %

 

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

 

≥ 1  %

[Note 1 ]

Component classified as:

Generic concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as:

Component classified as:

Component classified as:

Generic concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as:

Generic concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as:

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

≥ 0,1  %

 

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 1 endocrine disruptor for the environment

≥ 0,1  %

≥ 0,1  %

 

 

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

 

≥ 1  %

[Note 1 ]

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment

 

 

≥ 1  %

[Note 1 ]

≥ 1  %

[Note 1 ]

Note: The concentration limits in this Table apply to solids and liquids (w/w units) as well as gases (v/v units).

Note: The concentration limits in this Table apply to solids and liquids (w/w units) as well as gases (v/v units).  

Note 1: If a Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment is present in the mixture as an ingredient at a concentration ≥ 0,1 % a SDS shall be available for the mixture upon request.

Note 1: If a Category 2 endocrine disruptor for the environment is present in the mixture as an ingredient at a concentration ≥ 0,1 % a SDS shall be available for the mixture upon request.  

4.2.3.2.    Classification of mixtures where data are available for the complete mixture Classification of mixtures where data are available for the complete mixture Classification of mixtures where data are available for the complete mixture

4.2.3.2.1.   

Classification of mixtures shall be based on the available test data for the individual components of the mixture using concentration limits for the components classified as endocrine disruptor for the environment. On a case-by-case basis, test data on the mixture as a whole may be used for classification when demonstrating endocrine disruption for the environment that has not been established from the evaluation based on the individual components. In such cases, the test results for the mixture as a whole must be shown to be conclusive taking into account dose (concentration) and other factors such as duration, observations, sensitivity and statistical analysis of the test systems. Adequate documentation supporting the classification shall be retained and made available for review upon request.

4.2.3.3.    Classification of mixtures where data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles Classification of mixtures where data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles Classification of mixtures where data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles

4.2.3.3.1. Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its endocrine disruption for the environment, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures (subject to paragraph 4.2.3.2.1) to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, those data shall be used in accordance with the applicable bridging principles set out in Section 1.1.3.

4.2.3.3.1. Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its endocrine disruption for the environment, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures (subject to paragraph 4.2.3.2.1) to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, those data shall be used in accordance with the applicable bridging principles set out in Section 1.1.3.  

4.2.3.4.    Application in time Application in time Application in time

From 1 May 2026 at the latest, mixtures shall be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.2.3.1 to 4.2.3.3.

However, mixtures which were placed on the market before 1 May 2026 are not required to be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.2.3.1, 4.2.3.2 and 4.2.3.3 until 1 May 2028.

4.2.4.    Hazard Communication

Hazard Communication Hazard Communication Hazard Communication

4.2.4.1. Label elements shall be used in accordance with Table 4.2.3 for substances and mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class (Endocrine disruption for the environment).

4.2.4.1. Label elements shall be used in accordance with Table 4.2.3 for substances and mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class (Endocrine disruption for the environment).  

Table 4.2.3.

Label elements of endocrine disruption for the environment

Classification

Category 1

Category 2

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal Word

Danger

Warning

Hazard Statement

EUH430: May cause endocrine disruption in the environment

EUH431: Suspected of causing endocrine disruption in the environment

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

P405

P405

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Table 4.2.3. Table 4.2.3.

Label elements of endocrine disruption for the environment Label elements of endocrine disruption for the environment

Classification

Category 1

Category 2

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal Word

Danger

Warning

Hazard Statement

EUH430: May cause endocrine disruption in the environment

EUH431: Suspected of causing endocrine disruption in the environment

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

P405

P405

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Classification

Category 1

Category 2

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal Word

Danger

Warning

Hazard Statement

EUH430: May cause endocrine disruption in the environment

EUH431: Suspected of causing endocrine disruption in the environment

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

P405

P405

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Classification

Category 1

Category 2

Classification

Classification

Category 1

Category 1

Category 2

Category 2

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Symbol/pictogram

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

 

 

Signal Word

Danger

Warning

Signal Word

Signal Word

Danger

Danger

Warning

Warning

Hazard Statement

EUH430: May cause endocrine disruption in the environment

EUH431: Suspected of causing endocrine disruption in the environment

Hazard Statement

Hazard Statement

EUH430: May cause endocrine disruption in the environment

EUH430: May cause endocrine disruption in the environment

EUH431: Suspected of causing endocrine disruption in the environment

EUH431: Suspected of causing endocrine disruption in the environment

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Prevention

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Response

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Storage

P405

P405

Precautionary Statement Storage

Precautionary Statement Storage

P405

P405

P405

P405

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Precautionary Statement Disposal

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

4.2.4.2.    Application in time for substances Application in time for substances Application in time for substances

From 1 May 2025 at the latest, substances shall be labelled in accordance with Section 4.2.4.1.

However, substances which were placed on the market before 1 May 2025 are not required to be labelled in accordance with Section 4.2.4.1 until 1 November 2026.

4.2.4.3.    Application in time for mixtures Application in time for mixtures Application in time for mixtures

From 1 May 2026 at the latest, mixtures shall be labelled in accordance with Section 4.2.4.1.

However, mixtures which were placed on the market before 1 May 2026 are not required to be labelled in accordance with Section 4.2.4.1 until 1 May 2028.

4.3.    Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Bioaccumulative properties

Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Bioaccumulative properties Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Bioaccumulative properties

4.3.1.    Definitions and general considerations

Definitions and general considerations Definitions and general considerations Definitions and general considerations

4.3.1.1. For the purposes of Section 4.3 the following definitions shall apply:

4.3.1.1. For the purposes of Section 4.3 the following definitions shall apply:  

‘PBT’ means a persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substance or mixture that meets the classification criteria set out in Section 4.3.2.1.

‘vPvB’ means a very persistent and very bioaccumulative substance or mixture that meets the classification criteria set out in Section 4.3.2.2.

4.3.1.2. The hazard class Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Bioaccumulative properties is differentiated into:

4.3.1.2. The hazard class Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Bioaccumulative properties is differentiated into:  

— 
PBT properties and,
— 
— 
PBT properties and,
PBT properties and,
— 
vPvB properties.
— 
— 
vPvB properties.
vPvB properties.

4.3.2.    Classification criteria for substances

Classification criteria for substances Classification criteria for substances Classification criteria for substances

4.3.2.1.    Classification criteria for PBT Classification criteria for PBT Classification criteria for PBT

A substance shall be considered a PBT substance when it fulfils the persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity criteria set out in Sections 4.3.2.1.1 to 4.3.2.1.3 and assessed according to Section 4.3.2.3.

4.3.2.1.1.    Persistence Persistence Persistence

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the persistence criterion (P) where any of the following conditions is met:

(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine water is higher than 60 days;

(a) 
(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine water is higher than 60 days;

the degradation half-life in marine water is higher than 60 days;

(b) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water is higher than 40 days;

(b) 
(b) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water is higher than 40 days;

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water is higher than 40 days;

(c) 

the degradation half-life in marine sediment is higher than 180 days;

(c) 
(c) 

the degradation half-life in marine sediment is higher than 180 days;

the degradation half-life in marine sediment is higher than 180 days;

(d) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 120 days;

(d) 
(d) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 120 days;

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 120 days;

(e) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 120 days.

(e) 
(e) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 120 days.

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 120 days.

4.3.2.1.2.    Bioaccumulation Bioaccumulation Bioaccumulation

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the bioaccumulation criterion (B) where the bioconcentration factor in aquatic species is higher than 2 000 .

4.3.2.1.3.    Toxicity Toxicity Toxicity

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the toxicity criterion (T) in any of the following situations:

(a) 

the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) or ECx (e.g. EC10) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0,01 mg/l;

(a) 
(a) 

the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) or ECx (e.g. EC10) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0,01 mg/l;

the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) or ECx (e.g. EC10) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0,01 mg/l;

(b) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as carcinogenic (category 1A or 1B), germ cell mutagenic (category 1A or 1B), or toxic for reproduction (category 1A, 1B, or 2) according to Sections 3.5, 3.6 or 3.7;

(b) 
(b) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as carcinogenic (category 1A or 1B), germ cell mutagenic (category 1A or 1B), or toxic for reproduction (category 1A, 1B, or 2) according to Sections 3.5, 3.6 or 3.7;

the substance meets the criteria for classification as carcinogenic (category 1A or 1B), germ cell mutagenic (category 1A or 1B), or toxic for reproduction (category 1A, 1B, or 2) according to Sections 3.5, 3.6 or 3.7;

(c) 

there is other evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the substance meeting the criteria for classification: specific target organ toxicity after repeated exposure (STOT RE category 1 or 2) according to Section 3.9;

(c) 
(c) 

there is other evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the substance meeting the criteria for classification: specific target organ toxicity after repeated exposure (STOT RE category 1 or 2) according to Section 3.9;

there is other evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the substance meeting the criteria for classification: specific target organ toxicity after repeated exposure (STOT RE category 1 or 2) according to Section 3.9;

(d) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (category 1) for humans or the environment according to Sections 3.11 or 4.2.

(d) 
(d) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (category 1) for humans or the environment according to Sections 3.11 or 4.2.

the substance meets the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (category 1) for humans or the environment according to Sections 3.11 or 4.2.

4.3.2.2.    Classification criteria for vPvB Classification criteria for vPvB Classification criteria for vPvB

A substance shall be considered a vPvB substance when it fulfils the persistence and bioaccumulation criteria set out in Sections 4.3.2.2.1 and 4.3.2.2.2 and assessed according to Section 4.3.2.3.

4.3.2.2.1.   Persistence Persistence

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the ‘very persistent’ criterion (vP) where any of the following conditions is met:

(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water is higher than 60 days;

(a) 
(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water is higher than 60 days;

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water is higher than 60 days;

(b) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 180 days;

(b) 
(b) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 180 days;

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 180 days;

(c) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 180 days.

(c) 
(c) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 180 days.

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 180 days.

4.3.2.2.2.    Bioaccumulation Bioaccumulation Bioaccumulation

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the ‘very bioaccumulative’ criterion (vB) where the bioconcentration factor in aquatic species is higher than 5 000 .

4.3.2.3.    Basis of classification Basis of classification Basis of classification

For the classification of PBT substances and vPvB substances, a weight of evidence determination using expert judgement shall be applied, by comparing all relevant and available information listed in Section 4.3.2.3 with the criteria set out in Sections 4.3.2.1 and 4.3.2.2. That weight of evidence shall be applied in particular where the criteria set out in Sections 4.3.2.1 and 4.3.2.2 cannot be applied directly to the available information.

The information used for the purposes of assessment of the PBT/vPvB properties shall be based on data obtained under relevant conditions.

The identification shall also take account of the PBT/vPvB properties of relevant constituents, additives or impurities of a substance and relevant transformation or degradation products.

This hazard class (Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) or Very Persistent, Very Bioaccumulative (vPvB) properties) shall apply to all organic substances, including organo-metals.

The information set out in Sections 4.3.2.3.1, 4.3.2.3.2 and 4.3.2.3.3 shall be considered for the assessment of P, vP, B, vB and T properties.

4.3.2.3.1.    Assessment of P or vP properties Assessment of P or vP properties Assessment of P or vP properties

The following information shall be considered for the assessment of P or vP properties:

(a) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in surface water;

(a) 
(a) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in surface water;

results from simulation testing on degradation in surface water;

(b) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in soil;

(b) 
(b) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in soil;

results from simulation testing on degradation in soil;

(c) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in sediment;

(c) 
(c) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in sediment;

results from simulation testing on degradation in sediment;

(d) 

other information, such as information from field studies or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(d) 
(d) 

other information, such as information from field studies or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

other information, such as information from field studies or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

4.3.2.3.2.    Assessment of B or vB properties Assessment of B or vB properties Assessment of B or vB properties

The following information shall be considered for the assessment of B or vB properties:

(a) 

results from a bioconcentration or bioaccumulation study in aquatic species;

(a) 
(a) 

results from a bioconcentration or bioaccumulation study in aquatic species;

results from a bioconcentration or bioaccumulation study in aquatic species;

(b) 

other information on the bioaccumulation potential, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated, such as:

(i) 

results from a bioaccumulation study in terrestrial species;

(ii) 

data from scientific analysis of human body fluids or tissues, such as blood, milk or fat;

(iii) 

detection of elevated levels in biota, in particular in endangered species or in vulnerable populations or subpopulations, compared to levels in their surrounding environment;

(iv) 

results from a chronic toxicity study on animals;

(v) 

assessment of the toxicokinetic behaviour of the substance.

(b) 
(b) 

other information on the bioaccumulation potential, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated, such as:

(i) 

results from a bioaccumulation study in terrestrial species;

(ii) 

data from scientific analysis of human body fluids or tissues, such as blood, milk or fat;

(iii) 

detection of elevated levels in biota, in particular in endangered species or in vulnerable populations or subpopulations, compared to levels in their surrounding environment;

(iv) 

results from a chronic toxicity study on animals;

(v) 

assessment of the toxicokinetic behaviour of the substance.

other information on the bioaccumulation potential, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated, such as:

(i) 

results from a bioaccumulation study in terrestrial species;

(i) 
(i) 

results from a bioaccumulation study in terrestrial species;

results from a bioaccumulation study in terrestrial species;

(ii) 

data from scientific analysis of human body fluids or tissues, such as blood, milk or fat;

(ii) 
(ii) 

data from scientific analysis of human body fluids or tissues, such as blood, milk or fat;

data from scientific analysis of human body fluids or tissues, such as blood, milk or fat;

(iii) 

detection of elevated levels in biota, in particular in endangered species or in vulnerable populations or subpopulations, compared to levels in their surrounding environment;

(iii) 
(iii) 

detection of elevated levels in biota, in particular in endangered species or in vulnerable populations or subpopulations, compared to levels in their surrounding environment;

detection of elevated levels in biota, in particular in endangered species or in vulnerable populations or subpopulations, compared to levels in their surrounding environment;

(iv) 

results from a chronic toxicity study on animals;

(iv) 
(iv) 

results from a chronic toxicity study on animals;

results from a chronic toxicity study on animals;

(v) 

assessment of the toxicokinetic behaviour of the substance.

(v) 
(v) 

assessment of the toxicokinetic behaviour of the substance.

assessment of the toxicokinetic behaviour of the substance.

(c) 

information on the ability of the substance to biomagnify in the food chain, where possible expressed by biomagnification factors or trophic magnification factors.

(c) 
(c) 

information on the ability of the substance to biomagnify in the food chain, where possible expressed by biomagnification factors or trophic magnification factors.

information on the ability of the substance to biomagnify in the food chain, where possible expressed by biomagnification factors or trophic magnification factors.

4.3.2.3.3.    Assessment of T properties Assessment of T properties Assessment of T properties

The following information shall be considered for the assessment of T properties:

(a) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on aquatic invertebrates;

(a) 
(a) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on aquatic invertebrates;

results from long-term toxicity testing on aquatic invertebrates;

(b) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on fish;

(b) 
(b) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on fish;

results from long-term toxicity testing on fish;

(c) 

results from growth inhibition study on algae or aquatic plants;

(c) 
(c) 

results from growth inhibition study on algae or aquatic plants;

results from growth inhibition study on algae or aquatic plants;

(d) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as carcinogenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statements: H350 or H350i), germ cell mutagenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statement: H340), toxic for reproduction in Category 1A, 1B or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H360, H360F, H360D, H360FD, H360Fd, H360fD, H361, H361f, H361d or H361fd), specific target organ toxic after repeated dose in Category 1 or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H372 or H373);

(d) 
(d) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as carcinogenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statements: H350 or H350i), germ cell mutagenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statement: H340), toxic for reproduction in Category 1A, 1B or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H360, H360F, H360D, H360FD, H360Fd, H360fD, H361, H361f, H361d or H361fd), specific target organ toxic after repeated dose in Category 1 or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H372 or H373);

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as carcinogenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statements: H350 or H350i), germ cell mutagenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statement: H340), toxic for reproduction in Category 1A, 1B or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H360, H360F, H360D, H360FD, H360Fd, H360fD, H361, H361f, H361d or H361fd), specific target organ toxic after repeated dose in Category 1 or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H372 or H373);

(e) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (Category 1) for human health or the environment (assigned hazard statements: EUH380 or EUH430);

(e) 
(e) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (Category 1) for human health or the environment (assigned hazard statements: EUH380 or EUH430);

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (Category 1) for human health or the environment (assigned hazard statements: EUH380 or EUH430);

(f) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on terrestrial organisms; invertebrates and plants;

(f) 
(f) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on terrestrial organisms; invertebrates and plants;

results from long-term toxicity testing on terrestrial organisms; invertebrates and plants;

(g) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on sediment organisms;

(g) 
(g) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on sediment organisms;

results from long-term toxicity testing on sediment organisms;

(h) 

results from long-term or reproductive toxicity testing with birds;

(h) 
(h) 

results from long-term or reproductive toxicity testing with birds;

results from long-term or reproductive toxicity testing with birds;

(i) 

other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(i) 
(i) 

other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

4.3.2.4.    Weight of evidence and expert judgment Weight of evidence and expert judgment Weight of evidence and expert judgment

4.3.2.4.1. In applying the weight of evidence determination using expert judgment as referred to in Section 1.1.1 all available relevant scientific data shall be considered together, such as:

4.3.2.4.1. In applying the weight of evidence determination using expert judgment as referred to in Section 1.1.1 all available relevant scientific data shall be considered together, such as:  

(a) 

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies);

(a) 
(a) 

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies);

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies);

(b) 

information from the application of the category approach (grouping, read-across);

(b) 
(b) 

information from the application of the category approach (grouping, read-across);

information from the application of the category approach (grouping, read-across);

(c) 

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR), informing about P, vP, B, vB and T properties;

(c) 
(c) 

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR), informing about P, vP, B, vB and T properties;

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR), informing about P, vP, B, vB and T properties;

(d) 

results of monitoring and modelling;

(d) 
(d) 

results of monitoring and modelling;

results of monitoring and modelling;

(e) 

human experience such as occupational data and data from accident databases;

(e) 
(e) 

human experience such as occupational data and data from accident databases;

human experience such as occupational data and data from accident databases;

(f) 

epidemiological and clinical studies;

(f) 
(f) 

epidemiological and clinical studies;

epidemiological and clinical studies;

(g) 

well documented case reports, peer-reviewed published studies and observations;

(g) 
(g) 

well documented case reports, peer-reviewed published studies and observations;

well documented case reports, peer-reviewed published studies and observations;

(h) 

any additional acceptable data.

(h) 
(h) 

any additional acceptable data.

any additional acceptable data.

The quality and consistency of the data shall be given appropriate weight. The available results regardless of their individual conclusions shall be assembled together in a single weight of evidence determination.

4.3.2.4.2. In applying the weight of evidence determination, the following information, in addition to the information referred to in Sections 4.3.2.3.1, 4.3.2.3.2 and 4.3.2.3.3, shall be considered as part of the scientific assessment of the information relevant for the P, vP, B, vB and T properties:

4.3.2.4.2. In applying the weight of evidence determination, the following information, in addition to the information referred to in Sections 4.3.2.3.1, 4.3.2.3.2 and 4.3.2.3.3, shall be considered as part of the scientific assessment of the information relevant for the P, vP, B, vB and T properties:  

(a) 

Indication of P or vP properties:

(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iv) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(a) 
(a) 

Indication of P or vP properties:

(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iv) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Indication of P or vP properties:

(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(i) 
(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(ii) 
(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iii) 
(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iv) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(iv) 
(iv) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(b) 

Indication of B or vB properties:

(i) 

Octanol-water partitioning coefficient experimentally determined or estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(b) 
(b) 

Indication of B or vB properties:

(i) 

Octanol-water partitioning coefficient experimentally determined or estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Indication of B or vB properties:

(i) 

Octanol-water partitioning coefficient experimentally determined or estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

(i) 
(i) 

Octanol-water partitioning coefficient experimentally determined or estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

Octanol-water partitioning coefficient experimentally determined or estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(ii) 
(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(c) 

Indication of T properties:

(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(c) 
(c) 

Indication of T properties:

(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Indication of T properties:

(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(i) 
(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(ii) 
(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

4.3.2.5.    Application in time Application in time Application in time

From 1 May 2025 at the latest, substances shall be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.3.2.1 to 4.3.2.4.

However, substances which were placed on the market before 1 May 2025 are not required to be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.3.2.1 to 4.3.2.4 until 1 November 2026.

4.3.3.    Classification criteria for mixtures

Classification criteria for mixtures Classification criteria for mixtures Classification criteria for mixtures

4.3.3.1. A mixture shall be classified respectively as a PBT or vPvB when at least one component contained in the mixture has been classified respectively as a PBT or vPvB and is present at or above 0,1 % (weight/weight).

4.3.3.1. A mixture shall be classified respectively as a PBT or vPvB when at least one component contained in the mixture has been classified respectively as a PBT or vPvB and is present at or above 0,1 % (weight/weight).  

4.3.3.2.  Application in time

4.3.3.2.  Application in time   Application in time

From 1 May 2026 at the latest, mixtures shall be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Section 4.3.3.1.

However, mixtures which were placed on the market before 1 May 2026 are not required to be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Section 4.3.3.1 until 1 May 2028.

4.3.4.    Hazard communication

Hazard communication Hazard communication Hazard communication

4.3.4.1. Label elements shall be used in accordance with Table 4.3.1 for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class.

4.3.4.1. Label elements shall be used in accordance with Table 4.3.1 for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class.  

Table 4.3.1.

Label elements for PBT and vPvB properties

 

PBT

vPvB

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH440: Accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

EUH441: Strongly accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Table 4.3.1. Table 4.3.1.

Label elements for PBT and vPvB properties Label elements for PBT and vPvB properties

 

PBT

vPvB

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH440: Accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

EUH441: Strongly accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

 

PBT

vPvB

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH440: Accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

EUH441: Strongly accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

 

PBT

vPvB

 

 

PBT

PBT

vPvB

vPvB

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Symbol/pictogram

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Signal word

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH440: Accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

EUH441: Strongly accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

Hazard Statement

Hazard Statement

EUH440: Accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

EUH440: Accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

EUH441: Strongly accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

EUH441: Strongly accumulates in the environment and living organisms including in humans

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Prevention

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Response

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Precautionary Statement Disposal

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

4.3.4.2.    Application in time for substances Application in time for substances Application in time for substances

From 1 May 2025 at the latest, substances shall be labelled in accordance with Section 4.3.4.1.

However, substances which were placed on the market before 1 May 2025 are not required to be labelled in accordance with Section 4.3.4.1 until 1 November 2026.

4.3.4.3.    Application in time for mixtures Application in time for mixtures Application in time for mixtures

From 1 May 2026 at the latest, mixtures shall be labelled in accordance with the provisions laid down in Section 4.3.4.1.

However, mixtures which were placed on the market before 1 May 2026 are not required to be labelled in accordance with Section 4.3.4.1 until 1 May 2028.

4.4.    Persistent, Mobile and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Mobile properties

Persistent, Mobile and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Mobile properties Persistent, Mobile and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Mobile properties

4.4.1.    Definitions and general considerations

Definitions and general considerations Definitions and general considerations Definitions and general considerations

4.4.1.1.   For the purposes of Section 4.4 the following definitions shall apply: For the purposes of Section 4.4 the following definitions shall apply:

‘PMT’ means a persistent, mobile and toxic substance or mixture that meets the classification criteria set out in Section 4.4.2.1.

‘vPvM’ means a very persistent and very mobile substance or mixture that meets the classification criteria set out in Section 4.4.2.2.

‘log Koc ’ means the common logarithm of the organic carbon-water partition coefficient (i.e. Koc). oc oc

4.4.1.2   The hazard class Persistent, Mobile and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Mobile properties is differentiated into: The hazard class Persistent, Mobile and Toxic or Very Persistent, Very Mobile properties is differentiated into:

— 
PMT properties and,
— 
— 
PMT properties and,
PMT properties and,
— 
vPvM properties.
— 
— 
vPvM properties.
vPvM properties.

4.4.2.    Classification criteria for substances

Classification criteria for substances Classification criteria for substances Classification criteria for substances

4.4.2.1.    Classification criteria for PMT Classification criteria for PMT Classification criteria for PMT

A substance shall be considered a PMT substance when it fulfils the persistence, mobility and toxicity criteria set out in Sections 4.4.2.1.1, 4.4.2.1.2 and 4.4.2.1.3. and assessed according to Section 4.4.2.3.

4.4.2.1.1.    Persistence Persistence Persistence

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the persistence criterion (P) in any of the following situations:

(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine water is higher than 60 days;

(a) 
(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine water is higher than 60 days;

the degradation half-life in marine water is higher than 60 days;

(b) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water is higher than 40 days;

(b) 
(b) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water is higher than 40 days;

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water is higher than 40 days;

(c) 

the degradation half-life in marine sediment is higher than 180 days;

(c) 
(c) 

the degradation half-life in marine sediment is higher than 180 days;

the degradation half-life in marine sediment is higher than 180 days;

(d) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 120 days;

(d) 
(d) 

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 120 days;

the degradation half-life in fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 120 days;

(e) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 120 days.

(e) 
(e) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 120 days.

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 120 days.

4.4.2.1.2.    Mobility Mobility Mobility

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the mobility criterion (M) when the log Koc is less than 3. For an ionisable substance, the mobility criterion shall be considered fulfilled when the lowest log Koc value for pH between 4 and 9 is less than 3. oc oc

4.4.2.1.3.    Toxicity Toxicity Toxicity

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the toxicity criterion (T) in any of the following situations:

(a) 

the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) or ECx (e.g. EC10) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0,01 mg/l;

(a) 
(a) 

the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) or ECx (e.g. EC10) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0,01 mg/l;

the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) or ECx (e.g. EC10) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0,01 mg/l;

(b) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as carcinogenic (category 1A or 1B), germ cell mutagenic (category 1A or 1B), or toxic for reproduction (category 1A, 1B, or 2) according to Sections 3.5, 3.6 or 3.7;

(b) 
(b) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as carcinogenic (category 1A or 1B), germ cell mutagenic (category 1A or 1B), or toxic for reproduction (category 1A, 1B, or 2) according to Sections 3.5, 3.6 or 3.7;

the substance meets the criteria for classification as carcinogenic (category 1A or 1B), germ cell mutagenic (category 1A or 1B), or toxic for reproduction (category 1A, 1B, or 2) according to Sections 3.5, 3.6 or 3.7;

(c) 

there is other evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the substance meeting the criteria for classification as specific target organ toxicity after repeated exposure (STOT RE category 1 or 2) according to Section 3.9;

(c) 
(c) 

there is other evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the substance meeting the criteria for classification as specific target organ toxicity after repeated exposure (STOT RE category 1 or 2) according to Section 3.9;

there is other evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the substance meeting the criteria for classification as specific target organ toxicity after repeated exposure (STOT RE category 1 or 2) according to Section 3.9;

(d) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (category 1) for human health or the environment according to Sections 3.11 or 4.2.

(d) 
(d) 

the substance meets the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (category 1) for human health or the environment according to Sections 3.11 or 4.2.

the substance meets the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (category 1) for human health or the environment according to Sections 3.11 or 4.2.

4.4.2.2.    Classification criteria for vPvM Classification criteria for vPvM Classification criteria for vPvM

A substance shall be considered a vPvM substance when it fulfils the persistence and mobility criteria set out in Sections 4.4.2.2.1 and 4.4.2.2.2 and assessed according to Section 4.4.2.3.

4.4.2.2.1.    Persistence Persistence Persistence

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the ‘very persistent’ criterion (vP) in any of the following situations:

(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water is higher than 60 days;

(a) 
(a) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water is higher than 60 days;

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water is higher than 60 days;

(b) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 180 days;

(b) 
(b) 

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 180 days;

the degradation half-life in marine, fresh or estuarine water sediment is higher than 180 days;

(c) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 180 days.

(c) 
(c) 

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 180 days.

the degradation half-life in soil is higher than 180 days.

4.4.2.2.2.    Mobility Mobility Mobility

A substance shall be considered to fulfil the ‘very mobile’ criterion (vM) when the log Koc is less than 2. For an ionisable substance, the mobility criterion shall be considered fulfilled when the lowest log Koc value for pH between 4 and 9 is less than 2. oc oc

4.4.2.3.    Basis of classification Basis of classification Basis of classification

For the classification of PMT substances and vPvM substances, a weight of evidence determination using expert judgment shall be applied, by comparing all relevant and available information listed in Section 4.4.2.3 with the criteria set out in Sections 4.4.2.1 and 4.4.2.2. That weight of evidence shall be applied in particular where the criteria set out in Sections 4.4.2.1 and 4.4.2.2 cannot be applied directly to the available information.

The information used for the purposes of assessment of the PMT/vPvM properties shall be based on data obtained under relevant conditions.

The identification shall also take account of the PMT/vPvM properties of relevant constituents, additives or impurities of a substance and relevant transformation or degradation products.

This hazard class (PMT and vPvM properties) shall apply to all organic substances, including organo-metals.

The information set out in Sections 4.4.2.3.1, 4.4.2.3.2 and 4.4.2.3.3 shall be considered for the assessment of P, vP, M, vM and T properties.

4.4.2.3.1.    Assessment of P or vP properties Assessment of P or vP properties Assessment of P or vP properties

The following information shall be considered for the assessment of P or vP properties:

(a) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in surface water;

(a) 
(a) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in surface water;

results from simulation testing on degradation in surface water;

(b) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in soil;

(b) 
(b) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in soil;

results from simulation testing on degradation in soil;

(c) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in sediment;

(c) 
(c) 

results from simulation testing on degradation in sediment;

results from simulation testing on degradation in sediment;

(d) 

other information, such as information from field studies or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(d) 
(d) 

other information, such as information from field studies or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

other information, such as information from field studies or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

4.4.2.3.2.    Assessment of M or vM properties Assessment of M or vM properties Assessment of M or vM properties

The following information shall be considered for the assessment of M or vM properties:

(a) 

results from adsorption/desorption testing;

(a) 
(a) 

results from adsorption/desorption testing;

results from adsorption/desorption testing;

(b) 

other information, such as information from leaching, modelling or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(b) 
(b) 

other information, such as information from leaching, modelling or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

other information, such as information from leaching, modelling or monitoring studies, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

4.4.2.3.3.    Assessment of T properties Assessment of T properties Assessment of T properties

The following information shall be considered for the assessment of T properties:

(a) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on aquatic invertebrates;

(a) 
(a) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on aquatic invertebrates;

results from long-term toxicity testing on aquatic invertebrates;

(b) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on fish;

(b) 
(b) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on fish;

results from long-term toxicity testing on fish;

(c) 

results from growth inhibition study on algae or aquatic plants;

(c) 
(c) 

results from growth inhibition study on algae or aquatic plants;

results from growth inhibition study on algae or aquatic plants;

(d) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as carcinogenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statements: H350 or H350i), germ cell mutagenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statement: H340), toxic for reproduction in Category 1A, 1B or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H360, H360F, H360D, H360FD, H360Fd, H360fD, H361, H361f, H361d or H361fd), specific target organ toxic after repeated dose in Category 1 or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H372 or H373);

(d) 
(d) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as carcinogenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statements: H350 or H350i), germ cell mutagenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statement: H340), toxic for reproduction in Category 1A, 1B or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H360, H360F, H360D, H360FD, H360Fd, H360fD, H361, H361f, H361d or H361fd), specific target organ toxic after repeated dose in Category 1 or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H372 or H373);

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as carcinogenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statements: H350 or H350i), germ cell mutagenic in Category 1A or 1B (assigned hazard statement: H340), toxic for reproduction in Category 1A, 1B or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H360, H360F, H360D, H360FD, H360Fd, H360fD, H361, H361f, H361d or H361fd), specific target organ toxic after repeated dose in Category 1 or 2 (assigned hazard statements: H372 or H373);

(e) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (Category 1) for human health or the environment (assigned hazard statements: EUH380 or EUH430);

(e) 
(e) 

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (Category 1) for human health or the environment (assigned hazard statements: EUH380 or EUH430);

the substance meeting the criteria for classification as endocrine disruptor (Category 1) for human health or the environment (assigned hazard statements: EUH380 or EUH430);

(f) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on terrestrial organisms; invertebrates and plants;

(f) 
(f) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on terrestrial organisms; invertebrates and plants;

results from long-term toxicity testing on terrestrial organisms; invertebrates and plants;

(g) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on sediment organisms;

(g) 
(g) 

results from long-term toxicity testing on sediment organisms;

results from long-term toxicity testing on sediment organisms;

(h) 

results from long-term or reproductive toxicity testing on birds;

(h) 
(h) 

results from long-term or reproductive toxicity testing on birds;

results from long-term or reproductive toxicity testing on birds;

(i) 

other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(i) 
(i) 

other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

4.4.2.4.    Weight of evidence and expert judgment Weight of evidence and expert judgment Weight of evidence and expert judgment

4.4.2.4.1. In applying the weight of evidence determination using expert judgment as referred to in Section 1.1.1, all available relevant scientific data shall be considered together, such as:

4.4.2.4.1. In applying the weight of evidence determination using expert judgment as referred to in Section 1.1.1, all available relevant scientific data shall be considered together, such as:  

(a) 

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies);

(a) 
(a) 

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies);

in vivo studies or other studies (e.g. in vitro, in silico studies);

(b) 

information from the application of the category approach (grouping, read-across);

(b) 
(b) 

information from the application of the category approach (grouping, read-across);

information from the application of the category approach (grouping, read-across);

(c) 

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR), informing about P, vP, M, vM and T properties;

(c) 
(c) 

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR), informing about P, vP, M, vM and T properties;

data from analogue substances using structure-activity relationships (SAR), informing about P, vP, M, vM and T properties;

(d) 

results of monitoring and modelling;

(d) 
(d) 

results of monitoring and modelling;

results of monitoring and modelling;

(e) 

human experience such as occupational data and data from accident databases;

(e) 
(e) 

human experience such as occupational data and data from accident databases;

human experience such as occupational data and data from accident databases;

(f) 

epidemiological and clinical studies;

(f) 
(f) 

epidemiological and clinical studies;

epidemiological and clinical studies;

(g) 

well documented case reports, peer-reviewed published studies and observations;

(g) 
(g) 

well documented case reports, peer-reviewed published studies and observations;

well documented case reports, peer-reviewed published studies and observations;

(h) 

any additional acceptable data.

(h) 
(h) 

any additional acceptable data.

any additional acceptable data.

The quality and consistency of the data shall be given appropriate weight. The available results regardless of their individual conclusions shall be assembled together in a single weight of evidence determination.

4.4.2.4.2. In applying the weight of evidence determination, the following information, in addition to the information referred to in Sections 4.4.2.3.1, 4.4.2.3.2 and 4.4.2.3.3 shall be considered as part of the scientific assessment of the information relevant for the P, vP, M, vM and T properties:

4.4.2.4.2. In applying the weight of evidence determination, the following information, in addition to the information referred to in Sections 4.4.2.3.1, 4.4.2.3.2 and 4.4.2.3.3 shall be considered as part of the scientific assessment of the information relevant for the P, vP, M, vM and T properties:  

(a) 

Indication of P or vP properties:

(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iv) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(a) 
(a) 

Indication of P or vP properties:

(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iv) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Indication of P or vP properties:

(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(i) 
(i) 

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

Results from tests on ready biodegradation;

(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(ii) 
(ii) 

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

Results from other degradation screening tests (e.g. enhanced ready test, tests on inherent biodegradability);

(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iii) 
(iii) 

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

Results obtained from well-developed and reliable biodegradation (Q)SAR models;

(iv) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(iv) 
(iv) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(b) 

Information relevant for the M or vM properties:

(i) 

Organic carbon to water partition coefficient (Koc) estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

(ii) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(b) 
(b) 

Information relevant for the M or vM properties:

(i) 

Organic carbon to water partition coefficient (Koc) estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

(ii) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Information relevant for the M or vM properties:

(i) 

Organic carbon to water partition coefficient (Koc) estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

(i) 
(i) 

Organic carbon to water partition coefficient (Koc) estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models;

Organic carbon to water partition coefficient (Koc) estimated by well-developed and reliable (Q)SAR models; oc

(ii) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(ii) 
(ii) 

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Other information, provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(c) 

Information relevant for the T properties:

(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(c) 
(c) 

Information relevant for the T properties:

(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Information relevant for the T properties:

(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(i) 
(i) 

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

Short-term aquatic toxicity (e.g. results from acute toxicity testing on invertebrates, algae or aquatic plants or fish, in vitro acute toxicity testing on fish cell line);

(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

(ii) 
(ii) 

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

Other information provided that its suitability and reliability can be reasonably demonstrated.

4.4.2.5.    Application in time Application in time Application in time

From 1 May 2025 at the latest, substances shall be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.4.2.1 to 4.4.2.4.

However, substances which were placed on the market before 1 May 2025 are not required to be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Sections 4.4.2.1 to 4.4.2.4 until 1 November 2026.

4.4.3.    Classification criteria for mixtures

Classification criteria for mixtures Classification criteria for mixtures Classification criteria for mixtures

4.4.3.1 A mixture shall be classified as a PMT or vPvM where at least one of its components has been classified as a PMT or vPvM and is present at or above 0,1 % (weight/weight).

4.4.3.1 A mixture shall be classified as a PMT or vPvM where at least one of its components has been classified as a PMT or vPvM and is present at or above 0,1 % (weight/weight).  

4.4.3.2    Application in time Application in time Application in time

From 1 May 2026 at the latest, mixtures shall be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Section 4.4.3.1.

However, mixtures which were placed on the market before 1 May 2026 are not required to be classified in accordance with the criteria laid down in Section 4.4.3.1 until 1 May 2028.

4.4.4.    Hazard communication

Hazard communication Hazard communication Hazard communication

4.4.4.1. Label elements shall be used in accordance with Table 4.4.1 for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class (PMT and vPvM properties).

4.4.4.1. Label elements shall be used in accordance with Table 4.4.1 for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class (PMT and vPvM properties).  

Table 4.4.1.

Label elements for PMT and vPvM properties

 

PMT

vPvM

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH450: Can cause long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

EUH451: Can cause very long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Table 4.4.1. Table 4.4.1.

Label elements for PMT and vPvM properties Label elements for PMT and vPvM properties

 

PMT

vPvM

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH450: Can cause long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

EUH451: Can cause very long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

 

PMT

vPvM

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH450: Can cause long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

EUH451: Can cause very long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

 

PMT

vPvM

 

 

PMT

PMT

vPvM

vPvM

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

Symbol/pictogram

Symbol/pictogram

 

 

 

 

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Signal word

Signal word

Danger

Danger

Danger

Danger

Hazard Statement

EUH450: Can cause long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

EUH451: Can cause very long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

Hazard Statement

Hazard Statement

EUH450: Can cause long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

EUH450: Can cause long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

EUH451: Can cause very long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

EUH451: Can cause very long-lasting and diffuse contamination of water resources

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Prevention

Precautionary Statement Prevention

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

P201

P202

P273

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Response

Precautionary Statement Response

P391

P391

P391

P391

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

Precautionary Statement Disposal

Precautionary Statement Disposal

P501

P501

P501

P501

4.4.4.2.    Application in time for substances Application in time for substances Application in time for substances

From 1 May 2025 at the latest, substances shall be labelled in accordance with Section 4.4.4.1.

However, substances which were placed on the market before 1 May 2025 are not required to be labelled in accordance with Section 4.4.4.1 until 1 November 2026.

4.4.4.3.    Application in time for mixtures Application in time for mixtures Application in time for mixtures

From 1 May 2026 at the latest, mixtures shall be labelled in accordance with Section 4.4.4.1.

However, mixtures which were placed on the market before 1 May 2026 are not required to be labelled in accordance with Section 4.4.4.1 until 1 May 2028.

▼M2 ▼M2

Source: Content sourced from EUR-Lex and licensed under CC BY 4.0. This is an unofficial presentation; only the official EUR-Lex version is legally authentic.