3.3. Serious eye damage/eye irritation
3.3. Serious eye damage/eye irritation
|
3.3.1.1. |
Serious eye damage means the production of tissue damage in the eye, or serious physical decay of vision, which is not fully reversible, occurring after exposure of the eye to a substance or mixture. Eye irritation means the production of changes in the eye, which are fully reversible, occurring after the exposure of the eye to a substance or mixture. |
|
3.3.1.2. |
In a tiered approach, emphasis shall be placed upon existing human data, followed by existing animal data, followed by in vitro data, and then other sources of information. Classification results directly when the data satisfy the criteria. In other cases, classification of a substance or a mixture is made on the basis of the weight of evidence within a tier. In a total weight of evidence approach all available information bearing on the determination of serious eye damage/eye irritation is considered together, including the results of appropriate validated in vitro tests, relevant animal data, and human data such as epidemiological and clinical studies and well-documented case reports and observations (see Annex I, Part 1, Section 1.1.1.3). |
3.3.2. Classification criteria for substances
Substances are allocated to one of the categories within this hazard class, Category 1 (serious eye damage) or Category 2 (eye irritation), as follows:
Category 1 (serious eye damage):
substances that have the potential to seriously damage the eyes (see Table 3.3.1).
Category 2 (eye irritation):
substances that have the potential to induce reversible eye irritation (see Table 3.3.2).
3.3.2.1. Classification based on standard animal test data
3.3.2.1.1.
3.3.2.1.1.1. A single hazard category (Category 1) is adopted for substances that have the potential to seriously damage the eyes. This hazard category includes as criteria the observations listed in Table 3.3.1. These observations include animals with grade 4 cornea lesions and other severe reactions (e.g. destruction of cornea) observed at any time during the test, as well as persistent corneal opacity, discoloration of the cornea by a dye substance, adhesion, pannus, and interference with the function of the iris or other effects that impair sight. In this context, persistent lesions are considered those which are not fully reversible within an observation period of normally 21 days. Hazard classification as Category 1 also contains substances fulfilling the criteria of corneal opacity ≥ 3 or iritis > 1,5 observed in at least 2 of 3 tested animals, because severe lesions like these usually do not reverse within a 21-day observation period.
3.3.2.1.1.2. The use of human data is discussed in Section 3.3.2.2 and also in Sections 1.1.1.3, 1.1.1.4 and 1.1.1.5.
Table 3.3.1
Serious eye damage ()
|
Category |
Criteria |
|
Category 1 |
A substance that produces: (a) in at least one animal effects on the cornea, iris or conjunctiva that are not expected to reverse or have not fully reversed within an observation period of normally 21 days; and/or (b) in at least 2 of 3 tested animals, a positive response of: (i) corneal opacity ≥ 3; and/or (ii) iritis > 1,5; calculated as the mean scores following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of the test material. |
|
(1)
Grading criteria are understood as described in Regulation (EC) No 440/2008. |
|
3.3.2.1.2.
3.3.2.1.2.1. Substances that have the potential to induce reversible eye irritation shall be classified in Category 2 (eye irritation).
3.3.2.1.2.2. For those substances where there is pronounced variability among animal responses, this information shall be taken into account in determining the classification.
3.3.2.1.2.3. The use of human data is addressed in Sections 3.3.2.2, and also in Sections 1.1.1.3, 1.1.1.4 and 1.1.1.5.
Table 3.3.2
Eye irritation ()
|
Category |
Criteria |
|
Category 2 |
Substances that produce in at least 2 of 3 tested animals a positive response of: (a) corneal opacity ≥ 1; and/or (b) iritis ≥ 1; and/or (c) conjunctival redness ≥ 2; and/or (d) conjunctival oedema (chemosis) ≥ 2 calculated as the mean scores following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of the test material, and which fully reverses within an observation period of normally 21 days. |
|
(1)
Grading criteria are understood as described in Regulation (EC) No 440/2008. |
|
3.3.2.2. Classification in a tiered approach
|
3.3.2.2.1. |
A tiered approach to the evaluation of initial information shall be considered where applicable, recognizing that not all elements may be relevant. |
|
3.3.2.2.2. |
Existing human and animal data shall be the first line of evaluation as they give information directly relevant to effects on the eye. Possible skin corrosion has to be evaluated prior to consideration of any testing for serious eye damage/eye irritation in order to avoid testing for local effects on eyes with skin corrosive substances. Skin corrosive substances shall be considered as leading to serious eye damage (Category 1) as well, while skin irritant substances may be considered as leading to eye irritation (Category 2). |
|
3.3.2.2.3. |
In vitro alternatives that have been validated and accepted shall be used to make classification decisions. |
|
3.3.2.2.4. |
Likewise, pH extremes like ≤ 2 and ≥ 11,5, may indicate serious eye damage, especially when associated with significant acid/alkaline reserve (buffering capacity). Generally such substances are expected to produce significant effects on the eyes. In the absence of any other information, a substance is considered to cause serious eye damage (Category 1) if it has a pH ≤ 2 or ≥ 11,5. However, if consideration of acid/alkaline reserve suggests the substance may not cause serious eye damage despite the low or high pH value, this needs to be confirmed by other data, preferably by data from an appropriate validated in vitro test. |
|
3.3.2.2.5. |
In some cases sufficient information may be available from structurally related substances to make classification decisions. |
|
3.3.2.2.6. |
The tiered approach provides guidance on how to organize existing information and to make a weight-of-evidence decision about hazard assessment and hazard classification. Animal testing with corrosive substances shall be avoided whenever possible. Although information might be gained from the evaluation of single parameters within a tier (see 3.3.2.1.1) consideration shall be given to the totality of existing information and making an overall weight of evidence determination. This is especially true when there is conflict in information available on some parameters. |
3.3.3. Classification criteria for mixtures
3.3.3.1. Classification of mixtures when data are available for the complete mixture
|
3.3.3.1.1. |
The mixture shall be classified using the criteria for substances, and taking into account the tiered approach to evaluate data for this hazard class. |
|
3.3.3.1.2. |
When considering testing of the mixture classifiers are encouraged to use a tiered weight of evidence approach as included in the criteria for classification of substances for skin corrosion and serious eye damage/eye irritation to help ensure an accurate classification, as well as to avoid unnecessary animal testing. In the absence of any other information, a mixture is considered to cause serious eye damage (Category 1) if it has a pH ≤ 2 or ≥ 11,5. However, if consideration of acid/alkali reserve suggests the mixture may not cause serious eye damage despite the low or high pH value, this needs to be confirmed by other data, preferably data from an appropriate validated in vitro test. |
3.3.3.2. Classification of mixtures when data are not available for the complete mixture: bridging principles
|
3.3.3.2.1. |
Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its skin corrosivity or potential to cause serious eye damage/eye irritation, but there are sufficient data on the individual ingredients and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, these data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in Section 1.1.3. |
3.3.3.3. Classification of mixtures when data are available for all ingredients or only for some ingredients of the mixture
|
3.3.3.3.1. |
In order to make use of all available data for purposes of classifying the serious eye damage/eye irritation properties of the mixtures, the following assumption has been made and is applied where appropriate in the tiered approach: The ‘relevant ingredients’ of a mixture are those which are present in concentrations ≥ 1 % (w/w for solids, liquids, dusts, mists and vapours and v/v for gases), unless there is a presumption (e.g. in the case of skin corrosive ingredients) that an ingredient present at a concentration < 1 % can still be relevant for classifying the mixture for serious eye damage/eye irritation. |
|
3.3.3.3.2. |
In general, the approach to classification of mixtures as seriously damaging to the eye/eye irritant when data are available on the ingredients, but not on the mixture as a whole, is based on the theory of additivity, such that each skin corrosive or serious eye damaging/eye irritant ingredient contributes to the overall serious eye damage/eye irritation properties of the mixture in proportion to its potency and concentration. A weighting factor of 10 is used for skin corrosive and serious eye damaging ingredients when they are present at a concentration below the generic concentration limit for classification with Category 1, but are at a concentration that will contribute to the classification of the mixture as eye irritant. The mixture is classified as seriously damaging to the eye or eye irritant when the sum of the concentrations of such ingredients exceeds a concentration limit. |
|
3.3.3.3.3. |
Table 3.3.3 provides the generic concentration limits to be used to determine if the mixture shall be classified as seriously damaging to the eye or as eye irritant. |
|
3.3.3.3.4.1. |
Particular care must be taken when classifying certain types of mixtures containing substances such as acids and bases, inorganic salts, aldehydes, phenols, and surfactants. The approach explained in Sections 3.3.3.3.1 and 3.3.3.3.2 might not work given that many such substances are seriously damaging to the eye/eye irritant at concentrations < 1 %. |
|
3.3.3.3.4.2. |
For mixtures containing strong acids or bases the pH shall be used as classification criterion (see Section 3.3.3.1.2) since pH will be a better indicator of serious eye damage (subject to consideration of acid/alkali reserve) than the generic concentration limits in Table 3.3.3. |
|
3.3.3.3.4.3. |
A mixture containing skin corrosive or serious eye damaging/eye irritating ingredients that cannot be classified based on the additivity approach (Table 3.3.3) due to chemical characteristics that make this approach unworkable, shall be classified as Serious Eye Damage (Category 1) if it contains ≥ 1 % of a skin corrosive or serious eye damaging ingredient and as Eye Irritation (Category 2) when it contains ≥ 3 % of an eye irritant ingredient. Classification of mixtures with ingredients for which the approach in Table 3.3.3 does not apply is summarised in Table 3.3.4. |
|
3.3.3.3.5. |
On occasion, reliable data may show that the effects of serious eye damage/eye irritation of an ingredient will not be evident when present at a level at or above the generic concentration limits mentioned in Tables 3.3.3 and 3.3.4 in Section 3.3.3.3.6. In these cases the mixture shall be classified according to those data (see also Articles 10 and 11). On other occasions, when it is expected that the skin corrosion/irritation hazards or the effects of serious eye damage/eye irritation of an ingredient will not be evident when present at a level at or above the generic concentration limits mentioned in Tables 3.3.3 and 3.3.4, testing of the mixture shall be considered. In those cases, the tiered weight of evidence approach shall be applied. |
|
3.3.3.3.6. |
If there are data showing that (an) ingredient(s) may be corrosive to the skin or seriously damaging to the eye/eye irritating at a concentration of < 1 % (corrosive to the skin or seriously damaging to the eye) or < 3 % (eye irritant), the mixture shall be classified accordingly. |
Table 3.3.3
Generic concentration limits of ingredients classified as skin corrosion (Category 1, 1A, 1B or 1C) and/or serious eye damage (Category 1) or eye irritation (Category 2) that trigger classification of the mixture as serious eye damage/eye irritation where the additivity approach applies
|
Sum of ingredients classified as: |
Concentration triggering classification of a mixture as: |
|
|
Serious eye damage |
Eye irritation |
|
|
Category 1 |
Category 2 |
|
|
Skin corrosion Sub-Category 1A, 1B, 1C or Category 1 + Serious eye damage (Category 1) () |
≥ 3 % |
≥ 1 % but < 3 % |
|
Eye irritation (Category 2) |
|
≥ 10 % |
|
10 × (Skin corrosion Sub-Category 1A, 1B, 1C or Skin corrosion Category 1 + Serious eye damage (Category 1)) + Eye irritation (Category 2) |
|
≥ 10 % |
|
(1)
If an ingredient is classified as both Skin Corrosion Sub-Category 1A, 1B, 1C or Category 1 and Serious Eye Damage (Category 1), its concentration is considered only once in the calculation. |
||
Table 3.3.4
Generic concentration limits of ingredients that trigger classification of the mixture as serious eye damage (Category 1) or eye irritation (Category 2), where the additivity approach does not apply
|
Ingredient |
Concentration |
Mixture classified as: |
|
Acid with pH ≤ 2 |
≥ 1 % |
Serious eye damage (Category 1) |
|
Base with pH ≥ 11,5 |
≥ 1 % |
Serious eye damage (Category 1) |
|
Other ingredient classified as skin corrosion (Sub-Category 1A, 1B, 1C or Category 1) or serious eye damage (Category 1) |
≥ 1 % |
Serious eye damage (Category 1) |
|
Other ingredient classified as eye irritation (Category 2) |
≥ 3 % |
Eye irritation (Category 2) |
3.3.4.
Hazard Communication
3.3.4.1.
Label elements shall be used for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class in accordance with Table 3.3.5.
Table 3.3.5
Label elements for serious eye damage/eye irritation ()
Classification
Category 1
Category 2
GHS Pictograms
Signal Word
Danger
Warning
Hazard Statement
H318: Causes serious eye damage
H319: Causes serious eye irritation
Precautionary Statement Prevention
P280
P264
P280
Precautionary Statement Response
P305 + P351 + P338
P310
P305 + P351 + P338
P337 + P313
Precautionary Statement Storage
Precautionary Statement Disposal
(1)
Where a chemical is classified as skin corrosion Sub-Category 1A, 1B, 1C or Category 1, labelling for serious eye damage/eye irritation can be omitted as this information is already included in the hazard statement for skin corrosion Category 1 (H314).
|
3.3.4.1. |
Label elements shall be used for substances or mixtures meeting the criteria for classification in this hazard class in accordance with Table 3.3.5.
Table 3.3.5 Label elements for serious eye damage/eye irritation ()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||